Sticks and Stones and Apparently Words Can Hurt You


A recent decision by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal district which covers Georgia, Florida and Alabama) has suddenly made it far easier for plaintiff employees to assert unlawful harassment claims. At issue in Reeves v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. was whether pervasive vulgar language in the workplace can be enough to establish a prima facie case of harassment. Up to this point, in the 11th Circuit, a plaintiff was required to present evidence of physical touching in order to establish a claim of workplace harassment. Following the Reeves decision, “gender [and presumably other protected-class] specific” obscenities can fulfill the “based on” requirement of an unlawful harassment claim, even if the obscene language was not aimed at the plaintiff.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miller & Martin PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Miller & Martin PLLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.