A New Jersey District Court followed Spokeo’s Article III standing analysis and dismissed claims by three putative class representatives against Michaels Stores. Plaintiffs claimed that Michaels’ online employment application...more
2/14/2017
/ Article III ,
Background Checks ,
Class Action ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Disclosure Requirements ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
Hiring & Firing ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Job Applicants ,
Michaels ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Screening Procedures ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing
The Northern District of California dismissed a Fair Credit Reporting Act case against Lyft upon finding that plaintiff lacked Article III standing based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct....more
11/4/2016
/ Article III ,
Background Checks ,
Class Action ,
Credit Reports ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
Hiring & Firing ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Job Applicants ,
Lyft ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Sharing Economy ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing