As Holland & Knight has previously reported, California courts have consistently enforced state housing laws that preempt land use and planning decisions by local governments. (See previous Holland & Knight alerts, "Court of...more
6/22/2021
/ Ballot Measures ,
Constitutional Amendment ,
General Plan ,
Housing Developers ,
Housing Market ,
Land Use Restrictions ,
Local Ordinance ,
Moratorium ,
Preemption ,
Proposed Legislation ,
Referendums ,
State and Local Government ,
State Constitutions ,
Urban Planning & Development ,
Zoning Laws
In Murr v. Wisconsin, No. 15-214, 2017 WL 2694699 (U.S.S.C. June 23, 2017), the U.S. Supreme Court, in a majority opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy, addressed "one of the critical questions" in the law of regulatory takings:...more
6/30/2017
/ City Planning Departments ,
Common Ownership ,
Fifth Amendment ,
Just Compensation ,
Land Developers ,
Land Parcels ,
Murr v Wisconsin ,
Private Property ,
Property Owners ,
Reasonable Expectations Test ,
Regulatory Takings ,
SCOTUS ,
State and Local Government ,
Takings Clause ,
Zoning Laws
Aptos Council v. County of Santa Cruz ruling also clarifies CEQA "Piecemeal" Doctrine -
The Sixth District Court of Appeal's recent decision in Aptos Council v. County of Santa Cruz provides useful California...more
4/12/2017
/ Appeals ,
CEQA ,
Construction Industry ,
Environmental Review ,
Foreseeability ,
Future Harm ,
Land Use Restrictions ,
Local Ordinance ,
Regulatory Reform ,
Urban Planning & Development ,
Zoning Laws