Latest Publications

Share:

Insurer Must Assume Defense to be Liable for Failure to Settle Under Tyger River Doctrine

Recently, the United States District Court in South Carolina, 2019 WL 689545, dismissed a claim seeking a declaratory judgment that an insurer failed to settle an underlying tort claim. Briefly, plaintiff Church Creek...more

National Flood Insurance Program - Not Your Average Claims: Short Claims Deadline Relevant Following Hurricane Florence

The National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”) requires strict compliance with its rules and regulations and the United States District Courts for the District of South Carolina uphold this requirement. In a recent decision,...more

Litigators obtain Temporary Restraining Order against federal government relative to Medicare overpayment appeals

For the first time in the District of South Carolina, and the Fourth Circuit, a Medicare provider has successfully obtained a district court order enjoining CMS from recouping Medicare payments following an overpayment...more

Check Those "Choice of Law" Provisions!

Every business and commercial litigator has read countless contracts containing “choice of law” provisions. Such provisions are part of the standard boilerplate of virtually every commercial contract. Because “choice of law”...more

Tripartite Relationship: Insurers Suing Panel Counsel Lawyers

Recently, South Carolina joined the ranks of jurisdictions that allow insurers to sue their panel counsel when the counsel allegedly commits malpractice in representing the insured. Answering a certified question from the...more

Unlicensed Lawyers and Undue Influence – Setting Aside Deed Rejected

In a recent unpublished opinion, 2018 WL 679484, the South Carolina Court of Appeals addressed the circumstances under which a deed prepared by an unlicensed attorney would be voided in a challenge that also involved claims...more

Will the “Real” Representative Please Stand – Litigation in Estate Proceedings

Last month, the Supreme Court of South Carolina, in Fisher v. Huckabee, 2018 WL 1076808 (Feb. 28, 2018), addressed the question of who may bring a suit on behalf of a deceased individual if the personal representative has a...more

IRAs and 401(k)s Are Safe From Judgments – For Now

In a recent decision, the South Carolina Court of Appeals considered whether post-judgment contributions to an IRA, 401(k) plan, and a College 529 Plan are exempt from execution....more

John Doe Removals to Federal Court – Not so Fast!

In a recent decision of Brown v. Doe, 2018 WL 316714, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina remanded a John Doe action to the state court. Briefly, Plaintiff, who was driving her employer’s vehicle, was...more

Legal Malpractice – a Cautionary Carol

Sometime prior to 2009, a lawyer closed his law practice in South Carolina and moved to another state. Unfortunately, his ghost remains in South Carolina, providing cautionary tales this Christmas season for all lawyers....more

12/19/2017  /  Attorney Malpractice , Bankers , Damages

Aiding & Abetting Fiduciary Breach - What is “Knowing Participation” by South Carolina Professionals?

The South Carolina Supreme Court recently clarified liability for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty. In Bennett v. Carter, 2017 WL 5163467, the Supreme Court reversed summary judgment on a claim against lawyers...more

Sink or Swim – District Court Approves Removing Flood Insurance Claims to Federal Court

As hurricane season swings into full measure, the flooding of Hurricane Harvey has ravaged Texas, and Irma’s path remains uncertain, it is time to revisit the law of flood insurance....more

Every Dog Bite has its Day (in Federal Court)

In Lighthouse Property Insurance Corp. v. Rogers, 2017 WL 3634593, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina considered a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in an action...more

Bad Faith: District Court Remands Case Involving In-house Adjuster

Recently, the United States District Court in South Carolina closed the door on removal of insurance bad faith actions where the in-house, non-diverse, claims adjuster is a co-defendant. In Aung v. GEICO, C.A. No.:...more

District Court Rules “Professional Services” Exclusion means Professional Services

Recently, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina granted judgment in favor of an insurance carrier, finding the carrier did not owe a duty of defense or a duty to indemnify the insured in an...more

Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Bad Faith Litigation

The United States District Court has confirmed in a recent decision that in most circumstances, the attorney-client privilege will be waived in bad faith litigation in South Carolina. In Contravest, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Ins....more

UM, Wait a second! – Rekindled Exposure for Bad Faith Uninsured Motorist Claims in South Carolina

Recently, the United States District Court held a plaintiff can maintain a claim for bad faith handling of Uninsured Motorists Coverage (“UM”) in the District of South Carolina. In Tucker v. Peerless Insurance Company, the...more

Fourth Circuit Upholds 1-year Statute of Limitations on Flood Insurance Claims

In Woodson v. Allstate Insurance Co., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently upheld a one-year statute of limitations in flood insurance claims. Briefly, Hurricane Irene flooded the home of...more

When an Assault is not an Assault - Covered Up: SC District Court Denies Exclusion for Alleged Nightclub Assault and Battery

In a recent United States District Court decision, the court denied the insurer’s motion for summary judgment as to its duty to defend and indemnify for an alleged assault and battery. The facts of Certain Underwriters at...more

Is your Motor Vehicle Loan Safe?

Insurance policies may not protect the credit union's lien - Today’s insurance world is a complicated scene. Insureds have more choice than ever for insurance coverage. If a federal credit union has a lien on a motor...more

City Slickers and Airplane Litigation: Fight or Flight: Theobald v. Piper Aircraft, Inc.

Sometimes venue challenges are successful. Sometimes the convenience of the lawyers is not the standard for judging the proper venue for a lawsuit. In Theobald v. Piper Aircraft, Inc., 208 So.3d 287 (Fl. 2016), Florida’s...more

When a Lawyer Represents Himself, He has a Client…

The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently clarified the circumstances under which a lawyer can represent himself and when a member of his law firm can represent him. In Brooks v. S.C. Commission on Indigent Defense, a...more

Logos and Branding May Create Additional Parties to Insurance Coverage Litigation

Insurance coverage lawyers, when defending carriers in first-party claims, regularly deal with the real party in interest issue. The insured’s lawyer, in filing the lawsuit, sometimes names the wrong issuing company, the...more

US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Rules Federal Law Preempts Local Airport Regulations

“Noise policy must be carried out at the national level.” So says the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in overruling the Town of East Hampton’s attempt to locally control airport noise. The Second...more

Eighth Circuit Confirms Split in Airline Deregulation Act Pre-emption

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has set up a circuit split for the U.S. Supreme Court in Watson v. Air Methods Corp., 834 F.3d 891 (8th Cir. 2016). In Watson, the Eight Circuit affirmed its precedent...more

38 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide