Rigsby places discretion in the hands of district courts as to whether and how to sanction relators who violate the seal requirement in False Claims Act cases.
On December 6, 2016, only a month after oral argument, the...more
The decision in Universal Health upholds implied certification but strengthens False Claims Act defendants’ ability to mount a materiality defense.
On June 16, 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in...more
Oral argument in Universal Health indicates Justices disinclined to categorically reject False Claims Act implied certification theory, though may limit its scope.
On April 19, 2016, the United States Supreme Court heard...more
4/22/2016
/ Conditions of Payment ,
False Claims Act (FCA) ,
False Implied Certification Theory ,
Federal Contractors ,
Implied Certification ,
Materiality ,
Medicaid ,
Oral Argument ,
Reimbursements ,
SCOTUS ,
Split of Authority ,
Universal Health Services Inc v United States ex rel Escobar ,
Unlicensed Medical Providers