Federal Contractors

News & Analysis as of

OFCCP Settles Sex Discrimination Claims With Mental Health Provider

The Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) recently settled a case involving allegations of gender discrimination with federal contractor, Integris Mental Health (“Integris”).  As part of the settlement,...more

GSA Publishes Highly Anticipated Transactional Data Reporting Final Rule

GSA’s final transactional data rule fundamentally alters the basis for negotiation and pricing of commercial items on Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts and subsequent orders, with immediate impact on some of the largest...more

Supreme Court Validates “Implied Certification” Liability Under False Claims Act

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision on June 16, 2016, in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, No. 15-7, a case the government contractor and health care communities hoped the Court would use to...more

Supreme Court Hands Down Opinion in Universal Health Services v. Escobar

The Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated opinion in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar et al. yesterday—a case addressing the viability of the implied certification theory in FCA...more

SCOTUS Gives Fed Contractors Mixed Bag

Last week the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion that refines and re-defines liability for contractors accused of defrauding the Federal Government under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) in Universal Health Services, Inc. v....more

Supreme Court Recognizes Implied Certification Claims, With Limits

On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, a case in which the court evaluated the viability of the “implied certification” theory of liability under...more

Supreme Court Endorses Implied Certification Theory under False Claims Act—“At least in some circumstances”

On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous opinion addressing the scope and reach of the False Claims Act (“FCA”). Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States et al. ex rel. Escobar et...more

What does the Escobar Decision Mean for Healthcare Providers?

On June 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court in Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States ex rel Escobar, No. 13-317, — S. Ct. — (June 16, 2016), confirmed that the implied certification theory may serve as a basis for...more

New EEOC and OFCCP Guidance Highlight DOL Focus on Gender Discrimination

In connection with last week's United State of Women Summit, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued updated guidance on sex...more

Supreme Court ruling potentially expands false claims liability for healthcare providers

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled recently that the implied false certification theory may form the basis for liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), resolving a split of among the federal...more

Supreme Court Case Expands False Claims Act Liability

Summary of Decision - On June 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided a case which could have significant impact on healthcare providers. In Universal Health Services Inc. v Escobar, the Court expanded...more

Universal Health Services: contractors take note - Supreme Court approves implied certification theory of False Claims Act...

In a unanimous ruling handed down last week, the US Supreme Court settled an existing circuit split in favor of those seeking to expand the False Claims Act’s reach by recognizing the “implied certification” theory as a valid...more

Health Care Provider Alert: Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling on False Claims Act

The Supreme Court has reached a significant decision that will substantially affect health care billing, but in an effort to breed uniformity, the Court appears to have actually facilitated even greater uncertainty. Last...more

Obama administration announces new sex discrimination guidelines for federal contractors

On June 14, 2016, the US Department of Labor’s (DOL) Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) issued a final rule updating the sex discrimination guidelines governing federal contractors for the first time in 40...more

No More Mad Men: The OFCCP Leaves its Bell Bottoms Behind and Moves into the 21st Century

Not since the 1970s has the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) amended its Sex Discrimination Guidelines for federal contractors. With the newly issued final rule effective...more

Supreme Court Rejects Government's FCA Implied Certification Theory

The Supreme Court of the United States in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Escobar et al., weighed in on and embraced the implied certification theory of liability within the False Claims Act (FCA)....more

Supreme Court Endorses FCA Implied False Certification Theory of Liability with Limitations

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated False Claims Act (“FCA”) opinion in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar. The June 16, 2016, Court decision resolves a...more

OFCCP Issues Final Rule on Sex Discrimination

Last week, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs issued its Final Rule on Discrimination on the Basis of Sex. The new regulations rescind the OFCCP’s prior Sex Discrimination Guidelines and give regulatory effect...more

Final Gender Discrimination Rule for Federal Contractors Issued

Federal contractor healthcare plans, leave policies, accommodation practices, gender identity protections, and other employment practices to face increased scrutiny. For the first time in more than 40 years, the US...more

Universal Health Services v. Escobar

On Thursday of last week, the Supreme Court for the first time addressed the “implied certification” theory of liability under the False Claims Act. The Court ruled unanimously that the theory is valid in certain...more

SCOTUS Upholds Implied Certification for Some Cases But Imposes “Rigorous Materiality Requirement” for FCA Liability

The decision in Universal Health upholds implied certification but strengthens False Claims Act defendants’ ability to mount a materiality defense. On June 16, 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in...more

Supreme Court Adopts Implied False Certification Theory in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar But Imposes...

On June 16, 2016, a unanimous Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar (“Escobar”). The Court ruled that under certain circumstances the theory of “implied...more

OFCCP Issues Final Regulations on Sex Discrimination for Government Contractors

On June 15, 2016, the U.S. Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) published a final rule detailing the obligations of federal contractors to ensure nondiscrimination on the basis of sex, and to take...more

Supreme Court Rejects Government’s Expansive View of FCA Liability but Endorses Implied Certification Theory (with Limits)

On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States rendered a unanimous decision in the highly anticipated False Claims Act (“FCA”) case of Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar.[1] In its...more

DSS Revises Cybersecurity Requirements for Contractors Handling Classified Information

On May 18, 2016, Department Security Service (DSS) recently approved Change 2 (Change 2) to the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM). Change 2 significantly revised Chapter 8 of the NISPOM relating...more

1,393 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 56
JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×