In Salcedo v. Hanna, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that a TCPA plaintiff lacked standing to pursue a claim based on the alleged receipt of a single, unsolicited text message....more
9/9/2019
/ Article III ,
Chattel ,
Conversion ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Invasion of Privacy ,
Nuisance ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing ,
TCPA ,
Telecommunications ,
Telemarketing ,
Text Messages
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit found that unwanted, prerecorded phone messages to consumers, even without any other alleged harm, met the injury-in-fact requirement for Article III standing to bring a...more
7/24/2019
/ Article III ,
Due Process ,
Financial Services Industry ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Prior Express Consent ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Reduction of Damages ,
Standing ,
Statutory Damages ,
TCPA ,
Telemarketing
A plaintiff did not have Article III standing to assert claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) for alleged autodialed calls made to her without her consent, a California federal district court recently...more
9/7/2016
/ Article III ,
ATDS ,
Auto-Dialed Calls ,
Banking Sector ,
Consumer Lenders ,
Debt Collection ,
Debt Collectors ,
Invasion of Privacy ,
Prior Express Consent ,
Robocalling ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing ,
TCPA
A plaintiff did not have Article III standing to assert claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) for alleged autodialed calls made to her without her consent, a California federal district court recently...more
8/22/2016
/ Article III ,
Auto-Dialed Calls ,
Banking Sector ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Debt Collection ,
Dismissals ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Popular ,
Prior Express Consent ,
Robocalling ,
Standing ,
TCPA
In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez that an unaccepted Rule 68 offer of complete relief does not moot a plaintiff's individual claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third...more
4/8/2016
/ Article III ,
Campbell Ewald v Gomez ,
Class Action ,
Class Representatives ,
Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk ,
Mootness ,
Rule 68 ,
SCOTUS ,
Settlement Offer ,
Standing ,
TCPA
Phone calls made to promote a movie constituted “telemarketing” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) even though the two prerecorded messages left on the plaintiffs’ home phone line made no reference to the...more
7/30/2015
/ Article III ,
Class Action ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Do Not Call List ,
Popular ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Robocalling ,
SCOTUS ,
Spokeo ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standing ,
TCPA ,
Telemarketing