Claims Are Construed In Roofing Technology Case

Morris James LLP
Contact

SunPower Corporation v. PanelClaw, Inc., C.A. No. 12-1633-MPT, August 31, 2016.

Thynge, C.M. J.   Claim construction opinion issues regarding eight terms from one patent.  A Markman hearing took place on June 3, 2016.

The disputed technology relates photovoltaic roofing assembly. The following terms were considered:

  1. “fluidly coupling”
  2. “spacer”/”variable-height spacer”
  3. “access openings”
  4. “whereby wind uplift forces are resisted”
  5. “combined weight of about 2-4 (or 1.67-5) pounds per square foot”/” plurality of PV assemblies has a weight of not more than about four pounds per square foot”
  6. “means for interlocking”
  7. “means for interengaging adjacent photovoltaic assemblies, said array defining a perimeter”
  8. “means for resisting wind uplift forces sufficiently to eliminate the need for penetrations to the rooftop”

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide