Court Orders Fee Award for Defendants in Patent Case, Using New Octane Fitness Standard

Troutman Pepper
Contact

On August 19, Chief Judge Petrese Tucker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued an opinion awarding more than $6.5 million in attorneys’ fees to two defendant corporations who prevailed at trial in a patent infringement case. The fee award is the largest issued since the U.S. Supreme Court’s May 2014 ruling in Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. changed the standard that courts use to determine if the prevailing party is entitled to payment of its fees and costs in patent cases deemed “exceptional” under Section 285 of the Patent Act (35 U.S.C. § 285), and is the fourth-largest fee award in a patent case in the last decade. The final fee award is expected to be even larger, approximately $8 million, due to additional fees in pursuing the case to this point. The case was featured in several publications, including Law360 and The Legal Intelligencer.  Pepper Hamilton partners M. Kelly Tillery, Erik N. Videlock and Charles S. Marion represented one of the defendant corporations, Sensormatic Electronics Corp.

Judge Tucker’s opinion is available here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Troutman Pepper

Written by:

Troutman Pepper
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Troutman Pepper on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide