Halo v. Pulse (2016): Supreme Court Relaxes Standard for Obtaining Enhanced Damages For Patent Infringement

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact

Patent owners will more likely seek enhanced damages; accused infringers no longer insulated by “attorney’s ingenuity” after the fact.

Summary -

The Federal Circuit’s 2007 Seagate decision raised the bar for patentees seeking enhanced damages for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 284 by imposing a two-step test, requiring satisfaction of both an objective and a subjective prong. The test imposed the standard of clear and convincing evidence for each of the two prongs.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide