Healthcare Update, No. 1, February 2013: You Know It When You See It: Company "On Notice" Of Employee's Need For FMLA Leave

by Fisher Phillips
Contact

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) entitles an employee with a serious health condition to 12 workweeks of job-protected leave during any 12-month period.  The employee may sue if the employer interferes with the employee’s leave or reinstatement. 

But to prevail on a claim for interference, an employee must show that the employer was given notice of the need for leave. The employee need not specifically invoke the FMLA or use the phrase “serious health condition.”  The employee need only advise the employer he or she needs time off work for a reason that may qualify for FMLA leave.  As a healthcare provider recently learned, proceeding with a termination in the face of such notice can be costly. Clinkscale v. St. Therese of New Hope.

Watching A Meltdown

Ruby Clinkscale worked as a nurse at St. Therese of New Hope, a long-term care facility.  On October 11, 2010, after learning she had been reassigned from the rehabilitation unit to the long-term care unit, she expressed concern to her supervisor about her lack of training for the new unit and requested training.  In response, her supervisor told her she would not have a job if she did not work in the unit and threatened that she could lose her license for patient abandonment if she refused to work there.  

Clinkscale immediately went to the facility’s Human Resources Director and restated her concerns. While speaking with the Director, Clinkscale suffered an anxiety attack and began crying and shaking to such an extreme degree that she requested an ambulance.  In response to Clinkscale’s emotional distress, the HR Director directed her to go home and said they could figure things out the next day.  Clinkscale made an appointment with her physician for the next morning.

Clinkscale’s doctor believed that she had experienced a “situationally triggered,” anxiety attack.  He advised her to get therapy and prescribed two medications. He also provided her with a note to St. Therese recommending that she not work the rest of the week.  Clinkscale hand delivered the note to the HR department on October 12th.  In return, Human Resources gave her FMLA paperwork to complete.

Nevertheless, later that same day, Human Resources called Clinkscale and advised that she had been terminated on October 11th, for walking off the job.  Two days later (October 14)  Clinkscale’s doctor sent to St. Therese the completed FMLA certification, which indicated Clinkscale was “suffering from anxiety and panic attacks,” and indicated that she needed one week of leave because of her condition.  Approximately two weeks after advising Clinkscale of her termination, St. Therese filed a complaint with the State Board of Nursing that Clinkscale had refused to work and walked out.

Clinkscale subsequently filed a lawsuit against St. Therese for interference with her FMLA rights.  St. Therese moved for summary judgment arguing Clinkscale had no FMLA rights at the time she requested leave because she had been terminated before she ever requested any leave and because her termination was unrelated to her leave request. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of St. Therese, and Clinkscale appealed.

A Resignation Or A Firing?

On appeal, St. Therese argued that it was not on notice that Clinkscale needed leave when it terminated her employment because her supervisors thought that she had quit on October 11 – the day before she requested leave.  U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit rejected this argument.  First, the court noted that the St. Therese’s HR Director had instructed Clinkscale to leave work on October 11 after she suffered a visible anxiety attack during their meeting.

Moreover, St. Therese’s witnesses all admitted that Clinkscale’s supervisors and Human Resources did not discuss Clinkscale’s alleged voluntary termination until early on October 12 – the same day Clinkscale brought her doctor’s note indicating she needed leave to Human Resources by 9:30 and the same day Human Resources gave her FMLA forms to complete –an action that was inconsistent with any alleged belief that she had quit or had been terminated the previous day.  Therefore, the court held that a jury could conclude that Clinkscale provided notice as soon as practicable and that St. Therese was on notice of Clinkscale’s need for leave when it terminated her employment. 

The court also rejected St. Therese’s alternative argument that if Clinkscale did not quit, it terminated Clinkscale’s employment for patient abandonment.  The court noted that Clinkscale’s panic attack, which was a symptom of her anxiety disorder, and the HR Director’s instruction to leave work precipitated her departure from the facility.  Based on these uncontroverted facts, the court held that St. Therese’s argument that Clinkscale’s termination was completely unrelated to her need for leave was not viable. 

Finally, the Court rejected St. Therese’s assertion that it could not have known about Clinkscale’s need for leave because she previously had never suffered a panic attack at work and had not been diagnosed with anxiety disorder because the FMLA contemplated that the need for leave could arise unexpectedly. 

What This Means To Employers

Clinkscale possibly expands the concept of notice under the FMLA.   Specifically, the 8th Circuit seems to suggest that the HR Director had notice of Clinksdale’s possible need for leave – before she ever requested it – by virtue of his observation of her emotional meltdown, i.e., symptoms of her undiagnosed serious health condition, during their meeting.  Indeed, the 8th Circuit admitted that the fact that Clinkscale was not diagnosed until October 12 would ultimately bear on the jury’s consideration of the notice issue. 

Holding that an employer is on notice of an employee’s need for leave based on the employer’s observation of symptoms that may or may not be the result of a medical condition – particularly a mental condition – is an incredibly broad view of notice. 

But the court most likely was cognizant of the bad facts presented that did not pass the “smell” test.  Certainly the HR Director knew that he had sent Clinkscale home on October 11 so it is unclear how her supervisors could have believed that Clinkscale had quit once they spoke with Human Resources absent the HR Director’s wholesale failure to communicate that information. 

Assuming the decision to terminate Clinkscale’s employment occurred on October 12 before she ever presented her physician’s note, the second communication failure occurred when Human Resources gave her FMLA paperwork to complete without mentioning her termination.  This underscores the importance of Human Resources professionals and supervisors communicating with one another.

It’s not uncommon for an employee to preemptively assert FMLA rights when facing an unpleasant work situation or possible discipline.  That possibility makes it imperative for employers to document meetings concerning discipline and termination decisions that cannot be communicated the same day they are made.  Further, employers should be careful to proceed with a termination of employment in the face of what potentially could be notice under the FMLA.

For more information contact the author at MCreighton@laborlawyers.com or (404) 231-1400.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Fisher Phillips | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Fisher Phillips
Contact
more
less

Fisher Phillips on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.