Since the 2010 enactment of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, a recurring question in judicial opinions interpreting the Act’s whistleblower provisions has been whether these provisions should be given retroactive effect. Although federal courts have split on this question with respect to the Act’s restrictions on mandatory arbitration, a federal district court in Virginia has now held that the Act’s remedies for whistleblowers who share information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) do not apply retroactively.
The plaintiff in the case, Jones v. SouthPeak Interactive Corp., had been employed as the chief financial officer of one of the defendants. After allegedly concluding that the company falsely reported inflated profits, the plaintiff attempted to report her suspicions to the company’s internal audit committee and outside counsel. When her efforts allegedly failed to produce satisfactory results, she filed a complaint with the SEC’s Enforcement Division in 2009. The company terminated her employment several days later.
The plaintiff ultimately sued under the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and Dodd–Frank for unlawful retaliation. In response, the defendants moved to dismiss on the ground (among others) that the plaintiff’s Dodd–Frank claim was barred by the general presumption against retroactivity.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.