New York City on the Verge of Prohibiting Discrimination Based on an Individual's Unemployment Status

by Mintz Levin - Employment Matters
Contact

New York City employers beware: The New York City Council has once again acted to expand the nation’s broadest anti-discrimination law – this time to prohibit discrimination against New York City’s unemployed.  While several other jurisdictions (such as New Jersey, Oregon and Washington D.C.) have recently passed similar laws, the New York City measure goes one (major) step further: if enacted, unemployed individuals who believe they have been discriminated against on the basis of their employment status will have the right to sue in court and recover compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorneys’ fees. 

While Mayor Bloomberg has threatened to veto the law (which you may read here) calling it “one of the most misguided pieces of legislation” the Council has passed, an override may not be far behind as an overwhelming majority (44 of the Council’s 50 members) voted for the measure and just 34 votes are needed for an override.  If the Mayor does not veto the bill by next Friday, February 22, 2013, the new measure will become law and will take effect 90 days thereafter.  We will certainly be monitoring developments, and will keep you informed.

In a nutshell, this new anti-discrimination measure prohibits employers, employment agencies and their agents generally, from:

  1. Basing an employment decision with regard to hiring, compensation or the terms, conditions or privileges of employment on an applicant’s unemployment status; and
  2. Publishing, in print or any other medium, an advertisement for any job vacancy that states or indicates that (i) current employment is a requirement or qualification for the job; or (ii) they will not consider an individual for employment based on his or her unemployment. 

The law includes certain exceptions and examples of situations that would not be considered violations.  For example, employers, employment agencies, and their agents may lawfully:

  1. Consider an individual’s unemployment where there is a “substantially job-related reason for doing so,” and may consider the “circumstances surrounding an applicant’s separation from prior employment.”  In other words, an employer would be allowed to consider whether an applicant was unemployed because of misconduct or poor performance, rather than through no fault of his or her own.
  2. Base decisions on, or post advertisements identifying, “substantially job-related qualifications,” including “a current and valid professional or occupational license; a certificate, registration, permit or other credential; a minimum level of education or training; or a minimum level of professional, occupational or field experience.” 
  3. Limit the applicant pool to only those currently working for that employer; and
  4. Set compensation or terms and conditions of employment based on the person’s actual amount of experience. 

The law defines “unemployment” as individuals “not having a job, being available for work, and seeking employment.”  It does not appear, then, that the law covers those individuals who are currently working but who were previously unemployed or who have a history of unemployment.  Despite this limitation, the law currently protects a population of about 350,000 individuals who, on average, have been out of work for more than 10 months. 

As mentioned earlier, an individual may file a lawsuit in court, but they may also opt to lodge a complaint with the City Commission on Human Rights.  If just 1% (or roughly 3,500) of the current eligible population lodges a complaint with the already under-funded City Commission, its annual caseload would increase by more than 50%.  Courts, as the Bloomberg administration has argued, will also experience “significant feasibility and operational challenges” in processing this many new claims.  Of course, the impact of the new measure will be felt most by employers – already subject to strict liability under the human rights law – in that they will be forced to incur additional defense costs, especially those costs related to nuisance suits advanced by applicants rejected for otherwise valid reasons. 

Perhaps Mayor Bloomberg’s Deputy Counselor, Bill Heinzen, put it best when he testified before the New York City Council in June 2012, when the measure was first considered:

[A]dding this category blurs the line between irrational discrimination, which the Human Rights Law is supposed to address, and more complicated employment decision-making processes that can legitimately rely on multiple factors.  Unlike other bases for discrimination prohibited by the Human Rights Law, such as race, religion, or sex – which should never be relevant to hiring and employment decisions – a person's unemployment status may, in certain situations, be relevant to employers when selecting qualified employees. 

Mayor Bloomberg put it even more succinctly: “I can’t think of any rational employer who wouldn’t want to know what you’ve been doing for a period of time."  And although the Mayor and Deputy Counselor Heinzen are probably right, the New York City Council does not appear to see it the same way.

Therefore, if this law is ultimately enacted, employers should take steps to reduce their exposure, including by:

  • Training staff members involved in the recruiting and hiring processes about this newly protected category.  An October 2011 report by SmartRecruiters found that of those surveyed, “82% of recruiters, hiring managers, and human resource professionals, report the existence of discrimination against the unemployed” and that “55% of recruiters and HR managers surveyed have “personally experienced resistance when presenting qualified yet unemployed candidates to clients/colleagues.”  Thus, employers should train relevant staff members that an applicant’s unemployment status – like other protected categories – has no place in the decisionmaking process.
  • Training staff members tasked with interviewing applicants.  Employers should identify prohibited questions and instruct interviewers how to frame certain questions properly.  For example, rather than asking applicants how long they have been out of work, or the reason for a prolonged absence from the workplace, the interviewer should focus on why their previous employment ended, or whether they possess the requisite level of experience or training to properly perform the job duties associated with the vacancy.  Interviewers should be taught to keep the conversation focused on job-related skills and qualifications, even if an applicant tries to explain his or her difficulties in finding a job.  Employers should also train staff members how to properly complete applicant evaluations and document hiring decisions in order to comply with the law’s requirements. 
  • Consulting with recruiters or other employment agencies acting on their behalf.  It is no secret that some recruiting firms favor currently-employed applicants over unemployed applicants when helping a company fill a vacancy.  Employers should inform these firms and any other employment agencies they work with that the applicant pool should not be limited to currently-employed applicants. 
  • Reviewing employment advertisements and applications.  Clearly, employers should no longer post advertisements stating that only the currently-employed need apply.  But employers should also analyze whether any other part of their existing applicant intake processes would violate the new law.  This may be as simple, for example, as revising poorly-worded job postings that use phrases such as “recent experience necessary” rather than stating the level of experience necessary to perform the job.  Or it may require the employer to ensure that its electronic screening software does not filter out applicants who fail to enter current employment information on electronic application forms. 

We will continue to keep you posted on any developments related to New York City’s new unemployment discrimination law, as well any other proposed laws currently being advanced by the City Council (and/or State Legislature), such as the one that seeks to prohibit discrimination based on an individual’s credit history.  In the meantime, we encourage employers to seek the advice of employment counsel to help comply with this proposed new law, and, of course, Mintz’s New York Labor, Employment and Benefits practice attorneys are standing by as well.

 

Written by:

Mintz Levin - Employment Matters
Contact
more
less

Mintz Levin - Employment Matters on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.