Post-DOMA, IRS and CMS issue further guidance regarding same-sex spouses


Last September, three months after the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in United States v. Windsor, the IRS issued some much-anticipated guidance regarding the treatment of same-sex spouses. For employers who sponsor qualified retirement plans (e.g., a 401(k) plan), one of the most significant ramifications was the requirement that such plans recognize a valid same-sex marriage from another jurisdiction, even if the married couple lives in a state (like Oklahoma) that does not recognize same-sex marriage. In addition, terms like “spouse,” “husband” and “wife” were to be redefined to include individuals married to a person of the same sex.

While the initial guidance was effective September 16, 2013, it did not establish a deadline for employers to amend their retirement plan documents, if necessary, to comply with the new rules. That is, until now. 

IRS-buildingOn April 4th, the IRS issued further guidance setting a deadline of December 31, 2014, for many employers to amend their plan documents. It is important to keep in mind that even though employers still have time to adopt an amendment, the operations of an Oklahoma employer’s retirement plan must as of September 16, 2013 (i.e., right now), recognize valid same-sex marriages from another state for federal tax purposes.

Other government agencies have followed the IRS’s lead in issuing guidance in the new post-DOMA world. Last month, the Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued guidance stating that a health insurance issuer that offers non-grandfathered group or individual health insurance coverage must offer the plan sponsor, or individual in the individual market, the option to cover same-sex spouses on the same terms and conditions as opposite-sex spouses. It’s important to note that CMS guidance does not require private-sector employers to offer health coverage to same-sex spouse. The guidance merely clarifies that insurance companies offering non-grandfathered health insurance coverage must offer private employers and individuals the option to cover same-sex spouses. Employers sponsoring a self-funded health plan are not affected by this new CMS guidance.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McAfee & Taft | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.