Rapid Changes in Standards for Fees in IP Disputes

by Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.
Contact

Background of Attorney’s Fees in Patent Disputes

Old Patent Act Standard – The Patent Act by its express terms permits a prevailing party, whether a plaintiff-patentee or defendant-competitor, to recover its attorney’s fees from the losing party in “exceptional cases.”  The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, since its 2005 decision in Brooks Furniture v. Dutailier Int’l, has given the phrase “exceptional cases” a very limited interpretation: a losing plaintiff-patentee’s claims had to have been “objectively baseless” and brought in “subjective bad faith,” or a losing defendant-competitor had to have engaged in “material inappropriate conduct.”  In either case, the prevailing party had to show that the standard had been met by “clear and convincing evidence.”

Alternative Massachusetts Standard – A rarely used alternative standard for an award of attorney’s fees has existed for years for Patent Act cases brought in Massachusetts.  Under the Massachusetts Little FTC Act, also known as Chapter 93A, a prevailing plaintiff – but not a prevailing defendant – is entitled to an automatic award of its attorney’s fees.   The Patent Act does not contain a provision automatically preempting equivalent state law claims, as does the Copyright Act.  Thus, at least non-equivalent 93A claims seeking an award of attorney’s fees, such as where the plaintiff alleges extra elements or extra damages beyond those in a standard Patent Act claim, can be brought in Massachusetts.  Equivalent claims seeking attorney’s fees under Chapter 93A, where nothing extra is alleged, may also be possible.  See M. Gilleran, Enhanced Remedies for Federal IP Claims under State Law, Intellectual Property Today (Oct. 2007).

New Supreme Court Standard: Octane Fitness – On April 29, 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case of Octane Fitness v. Icon Health & Fitness in which it rejected the Federal Circuit’s Brooks Furniture standard for an award of attorney’s for claims under the Patent Act.  The Supreme Court re-interpreted the phrase “exceptional cases” to require only that the “case is simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of the party’s litigating position (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated.”  The Supreme Court ruled that the “exceptional cases” test provides that district courts are to make the determination “in the case-by-case exercise of their discretion, considering the totality of the circumstances.”  The new Octane Fitness standard also eliminates any requirement that the evidence be clear and convincing. In giving some guidance as to the meaning of the new standard, the Supreme Court did cite favorably to pre-Brooks Furniture cases applying tests which included such factors as the plaintiff being aware of the obvious invalidity of its patent, the plaintiff engaging in fraudulent conduct before the PTO, and the defendant continuing to infringe after an injunction.  These factors, and others, justifying an award of attorney’s fees in patent disputes are set forth in M. Gilleran and B. Birke, Enhanced Remedies in Intellectual Property Disputes in Massachusetts under Chapter 93A, Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly (Sept. 2013).

Potential New Congressional Standard – The U.S. House of Representatives has already passed H.R. 3309 (the Innovation Act) which amends the Patent Act and provides for a presumption that attorney’s fees will be awarded to the prevailing party unless the district court finds that the losing party’s position was reasonably justified in law and fact or that special circumstances make an award unjust.  The U.S. Senate has not passed any related legislation yet, but had considered legislation that would provide for a presumption of an award of attorney’s fees to the prevailing party but only if the losing party’s conduct or position was objectively unreasonable.  However, on May 21, 2014 Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D-Vt.), Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, delayed consideration of the Senate version, and so a new Congressional standard amending the Patent Act is not likely any time soon.

Attorney’s Fees in Trade Secret Disputes

Common Law Standard – Currently there is no Federal cause of action for misappropriation of a trade secret.  Thus, awards of attorney’s fees for state law causes of action for misappropriation of trade secrets turn on whether such awards are provided for under state law.  Although Massachusetts has not done so, many states have enacted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), which does provide that the court may award the prevailing party its attorney's fees against the losing party for “bad faith or willful and malicious misappropriation.”  Legislation proposed by Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick would adopt the UTSA and simultaneously repeal the current statutory scheme addressing liability and injunctive relief for trade secret misappropriation.

Alternative Massachusetts Standard – Since Massachusetts has not enacted the UTSA, yet, the only clear vehicle for an award of attorney’s fees in trade secret cases in Massachusetts is the Massachusetts Little FTC Act, Chapter 93A.  Under established Massachusetts case law interpreting Chapter 93A misappropriation of a trade secret is an unfair and deceptive act in violation of Chapter 93A, and gives rise to an automatic award of attorney’s fees regardless of whether the defendant’s conduct or position was willful, in bad faith or objectively unreasonable.

Potential New Congressional Standard – Just filed in the Senate on April 29, 2014, but nowhere near being enacted, is a bill entitled the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA).  Along with creating a Federal cause of action for claims alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, the DTSA would create a Federal legislative standard for awards of attorney’s fees in trade secret cases.  The new standard would provide for an award of attorney’s fees to the plaintiff if the defendant willfully misappropriated the trade secret, and to the defendant if the plaintiff asserted a claim of misappropriation in bad faith.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.
Contact
more
less

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!