Senate Legislation Update -- The Commerce Committee Gets in the Act

by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
Contact

\ Washington - Capitol #2Last Thursday, Sen. McCaskill, along with Sen. Rockefeller, introduced the "Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act" (S. 2049).  Of course, several other bills are currently pending in the Senate that have been introduced by such politicians as Sen. Leahy (S. 1720), Sen. Hatch (S. 1612), Sen. Cornyn (S. 1013), and Sen. Schumer (S. 866).  What sets the current bill apart is that it was referred to the Committee of Commerce, Science, and Transportation instead of the Judiciary committee.  This may be due, in part, to the fact that the McCaskill bill is directed exclusively to abusive demand letters, with enforcement provisions directed to the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC").  However, the Leahy bill also contains a demand-letter provision, and also provides the FTC with enforcement power.  It will therefore be interesting to monitor this newly introduced bill to see how it will be reconciled, if at all, with the other pending Senate bills.  The McCaskill bill was scheduled for mark-up today, March 5, 2014, but that was postponed, likely until next week.

Of course, the difficulty with any bill aimed at the sending of demand letters is that the First Amendment rights of patent holders need to be taken into account.  Congress cannot simply make the practice of sending such letters, without more, a judicial cause of action.  More importantly, the sending of such demand letters is an essential part of our patent system, allowing patent holders to put alleged infringers on notice and, ideally, facilitating licensing activity between the parties.  Care must be taken, therefore, to ensure that legitimate, non-abusive demand letters are not negatively impacted by any legislation.

On the other hand, curbing abusive demand letters is one of the only new legislative proposals that would impact pre-litigation activity.  Such controls are essential, the anti-troll activists advocate, because many so-called "trolls" never end up in a courtroom.  Instead, the argument goes, their main objective is to "shake-down" as many companies and individuals as possible, obtaining quick settlements because accused infringers are motivated to avoid costly litigation.  If true, then some legislation impacting demand letters should be necessary if the "patent troll" problem is truly going to be addressed.

The Innovation Act, passed by the House last December, struck an appropriate balance.  It was first made clear that the "Sense of Congress" was that the sending of purposely evasive demand letters was an abuse of the patent system.  Importantly, the redress was narrowly tailored to the perceived problem.  If a patent holder is found to have omitted certain essential facts from a demand letter, including the asserted patent and accused instrumentality, that same party could not rely on the demand letter as evidence in a willful infringement charge.  In other words, if the letter does not put the accused infringer on notice, it cannot be relied upon to establish that they had actual knowledge of the patent or that they might be infringing the patent.

The Patent Transparency and Improvements Act (S. 1720), introduced by Sen. Leahy et al., takes a different tack, providing that "[i]t shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice within the meaning of section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1))" to engage in the abusive dissemination of demand letters.  Specifically, it will be considered abusive if the patent holder (1) falsely threatens administrative or judicial relief, (2) the assertions lack a reasonable basis in fact or law, or (3) the content is likely to materially mislead a reasonable recipient.  However, just what constitutes a threat remains unclear.  It appears that Sen. Leahy had identified a particular "troll-like" behavior that he wanted to curb, but his proposed solution could end up impacting the legitimate assertion of patent rights.

Sen. McCaskill's bill is very similar to the provision in S. 1720.  First, the bill would require the FTC to "promulgate rules to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts and practices" in the abusive sending of demand letters.  The actions that would constitute unfair or deceptive assertion are the same as in the Leahy bill.  However, the McCaskill bill outlines just what information a demand letter should contain: (1) each patent and asserted claim; (2) a detailed description of the accused instrumentality; (3) a detailed description of the alleged activity; (4) notice that the recipient has the right to have the manufacturer defend against the alleged infringement; (5) information about any party with a direct financial interest related to the assertion of the patent; (6) any licensing commitments; (7) any methodology used to calculate compensation; (8) any activity of the patent at the Patent Office or in court; and (9) anything else the FTC deems necessary.  McCaskill's bill, much like the Leahy bill, would provide enforcement power to the FTC.  However, her bill goes beyond the Leahy equivalent in providing for enforcement power by the states' attorneys general on behalf of their residents, should it be determined that the citizens of that state are falling victim to such abusive activity.  The bill would provide for a civil penalty not to exceed $16,000 (adjusted for inflation) per violation of this rule.  The FTC would be able to intervene, and a state could not bring such an action if the FTC has already instituted a civil action.  The acknowledgement of the state attorneys general by the McCaskill bill is interesting, especially in view of their recent activity in states such as Vermont and Nebraska.

We will continue to monitor the situation in the Senate.  Sen. Leahy recently reported that he would like to schedule the mark-up for next month, but it will likely not occur until May.  It will be interesting to see how these two bills are rectified, or to see to what extent the two committees cooperate on passage of demand letter reform.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
Contact
more
less

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.