Silence Can Be Toxic - Or, Tips for Counteracting Trademark Bullies

more+
less-

On July 20, 2011, Steve Baird wrote in this blog, When Silence Is Not Very Golden, “We’re not recommending silence as a strategy for dealing with trademark demand letters”, and he pointed out the probable pitfalls of remaining silent rather than, in Steve’s words, providing, “an intelligent response that details the weaknesses or baseless nature of the trademark infringement claims inserted in the demand letter.”

From a communications perspective, failure to respond is almost always a toxic strategy to either the perpetrator, who should be responding to challenges, or the target, who chooses to suffer in silence as a method of avoiding the inevitable confrontation.

Remember, bullying is assault. Ninety percent of bullying is verbal, or written, but this type of victimization is often more profound and personally devastating than if the victim had been physically beaten.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Communications & Media Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »