Zone of Uncertainty: Director Considerations in Responding to COVID-19

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Directors managing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business must remember their fiduciary duties as they consider potential actions and approaches, including M&A and interested party transactions, and should consider the implications of control/affiliation for purposes of CARES Act financing.

TAKEAWAYS

  • Stay actively informed about the business and understand the portfolio company’s strategies and corporate plans, rely on the advice of experts, and establish a record of regular communications and meetings to reflect the decision-making process.
  • Consider implications on all stakeholders of potential decisions and stress-test ramifications broadly, especially for companies facing greater levels of turmoil, as all decisions will be second-guessed with 20/20 vision.

Boards of directors face the challenging task of managing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business, be it from reduced demand, supply chain or operational interruptions, employee issues, or liquidity constraints.

These challenges may be even more pronounced for constituent directors who have been appointed by private fund investors to serve on the board of a portfolio company investment.

Directors should keep their fiduciary duties in mind when considering potential actions and approaches, whether to preserve the corporation, to address short-term liquidity needs or take advantage of market opportunities. (This note generally assumes that the director serves on the board of a Delaware corporation and may not be applicable to a director or manager of a limited liability company, to the extent that fiduciary duties have been disclaimed in the LLC agreement.)

Fiduciary Duties Continue to Apply

COVID-19 does not change the fact that, generally, directors still owe a duty of care and a duty of loyalty and must act with due care, good faith, and in the best interests of the company.

  • In short, the Board should be informed about the business, including results of operations, and should understand the company’s strategies and corporate plans. The Board should be involved in and approve major decisions, while remembering that the duty of care cannot be delegated to other decision-makers (but directors can rely in good faith upon the advice of experts and management).
  • Level of appropriate involvement increases when risks to the enterprise present themselves. Prudent oversight is a matter of facts and circumstances—these are not normal facts and circumstances.

Solvency v. Insolvency

  • When the portfolio company is solvent, a director owes fiduciary duties to the stockholders—as well as to the company itself as an enterprise.
  • When the portfolio company becomes insolvent, or where a proposed transaction would render the portfolio company insolvent, creditors have the right to bring derivative claims for alleged violations of fiduciary duties. In the case of an insolvent company, it’s the creditors, not the shareholders, who would have been harmed.

So What Should I Do?

  • Stay actively (even more than normal) informed about the business and understand the portfolio company’s strategies and corporate plans, rely on the advice of experts and management, and establish an adequate record of regular communications and meetings to reflect the decision-making process.
  • Even though the COVID-19 pandemic may result in issues that need to be addressed quickly, the crisis creates conditions for poor decision making—be sure to allot adequate time for the Board to make an informed decision regarding a course of action, especially significant transactions.

Consider Implications of Control/Affiliation for Purposes of Available Financing

The CARES Act has proposed a number of potential financing routes for companies impacted by COVID-19. However, many portfolio companies will find it difficult to qualify due to the affiliation rules. While guidance may be issued that will loosen these restrictions, directors of companies with immediate needs should consider whether any steps may be taken to sever affiliation status and gain eligibility. Given the potential liability under the False Claims Act for improper filings, companies should seek the advice of experienced counsel to avoid missteps.

M&A Provides Opportunities (and Challenges)

Valuations may be opportunistic for private equity sponsors to acquire assets, but there are potential challenges to address.

  • Complete financial and legal due diligence with consideration of COVID-19 issues, including impact on financial projections, operations, demand, supply chain, etc.
  • For signed deals, consider whether to invoke a material adverse effect provision (or otherwise propose modifications to the transaction) if the prospects of a counterparty have been affected.
  • For deals still in negotiation, be wary of carve-outs to MAE and consider requiring additional representations regarding a target’s exposure to COVID-19.
  • Ensure that your financing document mirror the risks you’ve assumed due to COVID-19.
  • Consider potential delays to closing (including regulatory approvals, given the shutdown of certain governmental agencies) and ensure that financing commitments remain open for sufficient period of time.

Interested Party Transactions

If a potential transaction would involve a conflict of interest (e.g., a transaction with the private equity sponsor), consider establishing an independent committee of disinterested directors and obtaining approval of a majority of the minority stockholders and/or obtaining a fairness opinion.

Be Wary of Fraudulent Conveyances

The economic disruptions caused by COVID-19 may call into question the solvency and capital adequacy of many businesses previously thought to be solid. When a company is insolvent, fraudulent conveyance law addresses and potentially unwinds transfers other than for reasonably equivalent value. The same applies if the company has unreasonably small capital or is left insolvent as the result of the transfer. More specifically, affiliate party transactions and rescue capital transactions can be subject to after-the-fact litigation. In addition, there are legal arguments available in bankruptcy for an extended look-back period with respect to alleged fraudulent conveyances.

Do Not Resign—It May Make Things Worse

Generally, it is advisable to stay on the Board, as you have a better chance of persuading stakeholders that you are not responsible for the problem, but rather contributed to the solution. In addition, the board member who remains also has a better chance of obtaining a release in any bankruptcy plan. However, if you are aware that other directors or management are committing fraud and not willing to fix the problem, you should resign, as it is possible that you could be considered part of the fraud. In such a situation, you should consult your own counsel and not rely on the company’s counsel

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Contact
more
less

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide