Ladas & Parry LLP

Federal Circuit Saves 10k Patents By Reversing District Court Decision In Immersion Corp V HTC

On Tuesday, June 22, in the case of Immersion Corporation v. HTC, The Federal Circuit on appeal reversed a decision by the Delaware district court, which had held a patent granted on a continuation application to be invalid…more
| Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

The Sweet Sounds Of Victory: Vimeo Llc Wins Appeal In Music Copyright Infringement Case

On June 16, 2016 Vimeo LLC heared the sweet sounds of victory as it won its appeal in a music copyright infringement case (Capitol Records LLC v. Vimeo LLC ) filed in 2009, that centered on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act…more
| Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law, Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property

Famous Empire State Building Trademark At The Heart Of An Opposition Case

The Empire State Building has been in the heart of New York City since 1931 and was recently at the heart of a beer logo in a case heard before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). In the recent case of ESRT Empire…more
| Intellectual Property

Kuwait Now 149th Member Of Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Kuwait has officially joined the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) becoming it’s 149th member. The PCT supports applicants in pursuing patent protection in multiple jurisdictions for their inventions…more
| Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade

The Effect of The Brexit (UK Departure from EU) on IP Rights

In a June 23, 2016 referendum, the combined electorates of the United Kingdom and Gibraltar voted in favor of the United Kingdom, and consequently Gibraltar, leaving the European Union (EU). According to Article 50 of the…more
| Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade

Supreme Court In Kirstaeng V Wiley: Objective Reasonableness Not Controlling For Attorney Fees

The case of Kirstaeng v. Wiley hit the headlines in 2013 when the Supreme Court held that importation and sale in the United States of books bought from the copyright owner in Thailand was not an infringement of copyright, even…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property

Halo V Pulse: High Court Relaxes Standard For Enhanced Patent Damages

On June 13, 2016 Chief Justice Roberts delivered a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Halo v. Pulse on the question of when enhanced damages can be awarded for patent infringement. This decision reversed an…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property

Cuozzo V. Lee: Supreme Court Affirmed That Claims Should Be Given Their Broadest Reasonable Interpretation In Inter Partes Review

On June 20th, in Cuozzo v. Lee, the Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit holding that claims should be given their broadest reasonable interpretation in inter partes review proceedings…more
| Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

If The UK Votes To Brexit (Depart From The EU), How Will Your IP Rights Be Affected?

On June 23, 2016 the United Kingdom (UK) and Gibraltar will vote in a referendum to remain in or leave the European Union (EU). If the UK votes to leave, according to Article 50 of the European Union Treaty, the United…more
| Elections & Politics, Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade

Revised Standard Protective Order Of The TTAB Now In Effect

As of June 24, 2016, a revised Standard Protective Order of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) will become effective in relation to pending TTAB inter partes proceedings (some exceptions will apply) and all new Board…more
| Administrative Law, Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property

Fighting Over “Nothing”: The Trademark Battle Over Zero

Several big beverage makers recently took each other on in a consolidated proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). In the case of Royal Crown Company…more
| Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

IP Developments In Biotechnology And Trade Secrets

2016 has been a year of IP changes and these changes have had an effect upon biotechnology as well as trade secrets. Patents: Will the U.S. Supreme Court Grant Cert. In Ariosa v. Sequenom? Ariosa v. Sequenom was…more
| Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

California District Court Puts Baby In A Corner

In the United States, federal laws take precedence over state law and common law causes of action where there is an overlap. This lesson was recently learned again in Lions Gate Entertainment Inc v TD Ameritrade Services…more
| Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law, Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Conflict of Laws, Intellectual Property

Jury Determines Google protected by “Fair Use” against liability for its unauthorized use of Java APIs

In a stunning decision on May 26, 2016, a jury found that although Google was found guilty of copyright infringement, it would not be subject to billions of dollars in damages because the “Fair Use” Doctrine, as codified at 17…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Change Has Come To Trade Secrets In The United States: The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016

Concerns about trade secret theft have been increasing in recent years and the America Invents Act included provisions that reduced the commercial risks that a business would run by trying to keep inventions as trade secrets…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Commercial Law & Contracts, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment Law
Showing 1-15 of 98 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 7
Contact

United States

Contact: Matthew Asbell

  • 212.708.1800
  • 212.246.8959

Areas of Practice
  • Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law & Trade
  • Litigation
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Science, Computers, & Tech
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • Illinois
  • New York
Other Countries
  • Germany
  • United Kingdom
Number of Attorneys

25-50 Attorneys

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×