Latest Posts › Facebook Inc v Duguid

Share:

Court Finds Calls Triggered by Alarm System Do Not Violate the TCPA

In Watts v. Emergency Twenty Four, Inc. (No. 20-cv-1820 (N.D. Ill. June 21, 2021), the Northern District of Illinois granted a motion to dismiss claims asserted against a security company under the Telephone Consumer...more

A Chainsaw, Rather than a Scalpel: Supreme Court Holds Telephony Must Include Random or Sequential Number Generator to Qualify as...

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Duguid v. Facebook, finding once and for all that an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) as defined by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) requires a...more

Supreme Court Answers the Call on the Definition of an Autodialer

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Duguid v. Facebook to decide, once and for all, whether an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS), as defined in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), requires a...more

Breaking: Supreme Court to Weigh in on TCPA’s Autodialer Definition

On July 9th, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Duguid v. Facebook to decide, once and for all, whether an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS), as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) defines the phrase,...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide