A CEQA case challenging the City of Wildomar’s approval of a Wal-Mart retail complex has been dismissed because the petitioner refused to comply with discovery requests regarding its standing to sue. Creed-21 v. City of...more
12/26/2017
/ Appeals ,
Article III ,
Attorney's Fees ,
CEQA ,
Discovery ,
Dismissals ,
Environmental Policies ,
Motion for Sanctions ,
Retail Market ,
Retailers ,
Standing ,
Wal-Mart