Michael Qian

Michael Qian

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contact
View Bio
RSS

Latest Posts › 42 U.S.C. §1983

Share:

This Week at the Ninth: Habeas and Hair Loss

This week, the Ninth Circuit declines to extend a recent Supreme Court decision on retaliatory arrest to the immigration bond revocation context, and resolves a particularly hairy preemption question about state-law...more

1/18/2021  /  42 U.S.C. §1983 , Dietary Supplements , False Advertising , Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) , Food and Drug Administration (FDA) , Motion for Summary Judgment , Preemption , State Law Claims
1 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide