Sedina Banks

Greenberg Glusker LLP

+ Follow Contact

Latest Posts › Public Records Act

Share:

California Supreme Court Finds that a Public Agency Cannot Inadvertently Waive Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges

Last year, I wrote about the Second Appellate District case of Ardon v. City of Los Angeles. In Ardon, the appellate court found that a public agency can waive statutory privileges that it otherwise would have if it produces...more

3/18/2016 / Attorney-Client Privilege , CA Supreme Court , Inadvertent Disclosure , Public Entities , Public Records , Public Records Act , Split of Authority , Work-Product Doctrine

Can a Public Agency Inadvertently Waive Attorney-Client & Work Product Privileges? First and Second Appellate District Split on...

In January, I wrote about the Second Appellate District case of Ardon v. City of Los Angeles. In Ardon, the court found that a public entity can waive statutory privileges that it otherwise would have if it produces...more

9/16/2015 / Attorney-Client Privilege , Inadvertent Disclosure , Public Entities , Public Records Act , Split of Authority , Work-Product Doctrine

Public Entities Can Inadvertently Waive Privilege in Response to a Public Records Act Request

California’s Public Records Act (PRA) law requires public entities to make their public records open for inspection and copying. Environmental practitioners often use PRA requests as a tool to obtain information regarding a...more

1/23/2015 / Attorney-Client Privilege , Confidential Documents , Contaminated Properties , Privilege Waivers , Public Entities , Public Records , Public Records Act

3 Results

View per page

Page: of 1