In Skanska Civil USA Southeast, Inc. ASBCA Nos. 61220, 61347 (April 3, 2025), the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denied the contractor's claim for differing site conditions. The contractor asserted claims for...more
The ASBCA restrictively interpreted standard release language in a government modification.
In the Sauer Construction case, ambiguous release language couldn't bar a remediation claim, highlighting the need for clear...more
There is a reason why contractors need to review their contracts closely and the Washington Court of Appeals' decision in King County v Walsh Construction Company II LLC, No. 83787-7-1 (Wash. App. Ct. 2023) ("Walsh")...more
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ECC International Constructors, LLC (ASBCA No. 59643 November 9, 2021) issued a partial summary judgment order dismissing several of the contractor's claims for lack of a sum...more
In Harry Pepper and Associates, Inc., the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals addressed three exceptions to the strict enforcement of claim notice requirements in the context of a Government motion for summary judgment...more
In Future Forest, LLC, CBCA 5863 (March 9, 2020), the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals discussed the relationship between a minimum delivery order, comments on what volume of deliveries the contractor could anticipate under...more
In Watts Constructors, LLC, (June 24, 2019), the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) provided further guidance on its earlier decision ECC CENTCOM, 18-1 BCA 37,133. ...more