California and Vermont have recently joined a growing list of states that have passed legislation banning the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in food packaging. Relatedly, a group of environmental, consumer,...more
6/17/2021
/ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Food Manufacturers ,
Food Supply ,
Hazardous Substances ,
PFAS ,
Product Packaging ,
Proposed Regulation ,
Public Health ,
Regulatory Agenda ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure
On Friday, 16 April 2021, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the lead agency that implements California’s Proposition 65, proposed modified language for its new regulation on the warning...more
4/21/2021
/ Amended Regulation ,
Food Manufacturers ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Public Comment ,
Regulatory Agenda ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Supply Chain ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is extending the public comment period for its proposal that lays out what constitutes a Proposition 65 exposure that would require warnings for listed...more
On August 4, 2020, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the lead agency that implements California’s Proposition 65 (Prop 65), proposed to adopt a new regulation that would significantly change the...more
A lawsuit filed yesterday by the California Chamber of Commerce challenges the legality of Proposition 65 warnings on foods that contain acrylamide. The Complaint, which named the Attorney General of the State of California...more
10/9/2019
/ Cancer ,
Chamber of Commerce ,
First Amendment ,
Food Labeling ,
Injunctive Relief ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Public Health ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Retail Market ,
State and Local Government ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels
On October 9, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final rule revoking authorization for seven synthetic flavorings and adjuvants as food additives. Notably, FDA’s rigorous scientific analysis determined...more
10/30/2018
/ Additive Manufacturing ,
Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Food Labeling ,
Food Safety ,
Food Supply ,
Proposition 65 ,
Public Health ,
Regulatory Oversight ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Toxic Exposure
Last week, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the lead agency that implements California’s Proposition 65, proposed an amendment to the existing regulation requiring: (1) the average...more
On Friday, June 15th, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced a proposed regulation clarifying that exposures to Proposition 65 chemicals in coffee do not pose a significant cancer...more
Food companies and retailers doing business in California should take note of the recent proposed statement of decision in the case challenging the coffee industry’s failure to warn of the presence of acrylamide in coffee...more