25 Is the New 40: California’s AB-1687

by Garvey Schubert Barer

“It is time to stop the ageism that permeates Hollywood’s casting process,” wrote SAG-AFTRA President Gabrielle Carteris.[1] On September 24, 2016, California Governor Jerry Brown took a controversial step toward achieving such a goal when he signed the Customer Records bill, AB-1687 (effective January 1, 2017), into law. This new state law requires that Internet Movie Database “IMDb” remove an actor’s listed age upon request by that actor.[2] IMDb is a well-known website in the entertainment industry that offers information about movies, television shows, and actors. Its subscription service, IMDbPro, allows actors to create their own profile page and access job listings posted by industry professionals. Industry professionals directly use the website for casting calls and auditions and have been known to frequently filter out potential actors though information posted on the website. Thus, the broader goal of this law is to alleviate age discrimination in an industry that has been alleged to phase out ageing actors in a discriminatory fashion.

The current state and federal age discrimination laws may be said to fail to adequately protect employees in the entertainment industry. In 1967, Congress implemented The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634.[3] The purpose of the ADEA is “to promote employment of older persons based on their ability rather than age” and “to prohibit arbitrary age discrimination in employment.”[4] Under the ADEA, it is unlawful for an employer “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual or otherwise discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s age.”[5]

However, the ADEA may not go far enough in covering individuals employed in the entertainment industry. Age discrimination in the entertainment industry is alleged to start before the age of 40, which is the requisite age an employee must be to allege an age discrimination claim under the ADEA. In fact, many female actresses claim to lose out on roles, because of their age, as early as age 30.[6] In such cases, the actor would be unable to make out a prima facie case of age discrimination under the ADEA, because they do not meet the age 40 threshold. These individuals also tend to have further difficulty proving an age discrimination claim under state law because most states have similar age discrimination requirements as the ADEA.

There are numerous examples of actresses claiming to have been turned down for parts because of their age. Anne Hathaway has, at age 32, explained in interviews that she lost parts to 24 year-olds.[7] Similarly, Elizabeth Banks claimed that she was turned down for the role of Mary Jane Watson in Spider-Man in 2002 when she was 28 years old.[8] The 18 year-old Kirsten Dunst was instead offered the female lead, and played 27 year-old Toby Maguire’s on-screen girlfriend.[9] Olivia Wilde was turned down for the role of Leonardo DiCaprio’s wife in The Wolf of Wall Street when she was 28 years-old, ten years DiCaprio’s junior.[10] Instead, Margot Robbie, at age 23, was chosen as the female lead. Most notably, Maggie Gyllenhaal made headlines last year when she went public about how she was told she was too old, at age 37, to play the love interest of a 55 year-old male lead.[11] Each of these actresses is under 40 years old and would be barred from bringing an age discrimination claim under the ADEA.

In 2013, a less well-known actress, Huong “Junie” Hoang, litigated this issue of age discrimination in Huong Hoang v. Amazon.com, Inc. As an aspiring actress, Hoang had signed up for IMDbPro services in 2001 “[because it’s the bible of the industry.”[12] She utilized the services that came with an IMDbPro profile but wanted to conceal her true age of 30 years-old so she falsified her birthday on the profile to represent that she was seven years younger.[13] In 2007, Hoang decided to correct her age and contacted IMDb to remove her age from her profile.[14] An IMDb customer service representative conducted an investigation into Hoang’s birthday and published her actual birthday on the website, while Hoang continued requesting that her birthday be removed.[15]

Hoang filed suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington alleging wrongful use of her IMDbPro account that caused her to suffer age discrimination after her age information was published on the Internet.[16] She sought to recover for her lost acting income, which she termed “career damages.”[17] The jury rejected her breach of contract claim, which asserted that IMDb breached its Subscriber Agreement and incorporated Privacy Policy for failing to act “‘carefully and sensibly’ in the way it handles subscribers’ personal information,” and found in favor of IMDb.[18] Hoang appealed the verdict that permitted IMDb to list her age information on the website.[19]

In a 2015 appeal, Hoang objected to the jury instruction citing her agreement to provide IMDb with accurate information upon signing up for its service.[20] Two motions were made to file amicus briefs in support of Hoang: the first, by four screenwriters; and the second, by SAG-AFTRA and WGAW.[21] Both motions were denied for failing to address the grounds upon which Hoang appealed.[22] The Ninth Circuit unanimously affirmed in favor of IMDb. In response, SAG-AFTRA commented that the site was “facilitating age discrimination.”[23]

Since Hoang, SAG-AFTRA has publicly condemned IMDb for publishing the birth dates of actors without their consent.[24] Many of the actors include those less famous and unknown to the general public. The issue is that when an actor’s actual age becomes known to the casting personnel, the age range that casting personnel perceive the actor to be able to portray shrinks, and, thus, limits the actor’s opportunity to be selected for roles.[25] SAG-AFTRA stated that IMDb could “remove the temptation for employers to engage in age discrimination” and “step up and take responsibility for the harm it has caused” by removing age information from its website.[26]

The holding in Hoang and the perceived lack of age discrimination protection afforded to actors by federal and state laws may be some of the reasons for SAG-AFTRA’s ardent support of a new California law. The law, AB-1687, is intended to fill the void in both federal and state age discrimination laws. It specifies that paid subscribers who enter into a contractual agreement with a “commercial online entertainment employment service provider” to provide “specified employment services” may prohibit that provider “from publishing information about the subscriber’s age in an online profile.”[27] The law requires that the provider “remove from public view . . . certain information regarding the subscriber’s age on any companion Internet Web site under the provider’s control” within 5 days of a subscriber requesting such action.[28]

The law’s stated purpose is to ensure that the age information of a subscriber will not be used “in furtherance of employment or age discrimination.”[29] The law notably includes individuals employed in entertainment industries such as television, film, and video games. It is limited to a subscriber, who is defined in Subsection 4 “as a natural person who enters into a contractual agreement . . . to receive employment services in return for a subscription payment.”[30] Thus, this law leaves the door open for age information to be displayed on websites where viewers do not pay a subscription fee.

Proponents of the new law advocate that it will help alleviate some of the age discrimination female actresses allegedly face when passed over for roles, by limiting age information from a widely used website in the industry. This limitation would also help lesser known actors who have allegedly suffered from exclusionary hiring practices during auditions when competing for smaller roles because casting directors directly use IMDb profile information to fill smaller roles.[31] One of the most compelling arguments is that the law will halt the dangling of an actor’s age in front of casting directors, who dictate who is hired for a role and who may already have biases against older performers.[32]

Proponents also argue that the law will not be challenged as a restriction on First Amendment free speech, because the limitation placed on the law, which is its restricted application to only those who pay for a subscription, effectively insulates it from constitutional challenges.[33] The law only limits free speech in an effort to advance the important government interest of preventing age discrimination and does so in a manner substantially related to that interest. Thus, the law does not purport to limit other expressions of age-related free speech. Yes, age information will still be available on other prominent websites, but those who support the law argue that it provides actors with a new legal sword.

Contrastingly, critics speculate that the law will end up challenged before the Supreme Court for restricting free speech despite the limitation. Arguments suggest that the new law is not insulated from constitutional challenges simply because it advances a government interest and is limited to those people who pay for a subscription.[34] Further, critics oppose the removal of factually accurate age information from the Internet. Michael Beckerman, of The Internet Association, a political lobbying organization representing Internet companies, argues that the new law will not stop the “bad actors” who can search for age information on other websites.[35] “This is not a question of preventing salacious rumors,” argues Beckerman, “rather it is about the right to present facts that live in the public domain.”[36] The law effectively punishes Internet companies for the way in which people use the public data companies present.[37] Requiring only paid subscription websites to remove age information may create an unfair competitive advantage for websites that are not required to abide by the new law.[38]

The lawsuit that critics speculated about recently began on November 10, 2016, when IMDb filed a Complaint in federal court in California against California Attorney General Kamala Harris to overturn AB-1687 in an effort to protect its right to post actors’ ages on their website.[39] IMDb argues that not only is the goal of combatting age discrimination not achieved with AB-1687, but also that the law is unconstitutional and chills free speech while limiting public access to factual information.[40] IMDb is asking the court to enter a permanent injunction to ban California and its agencies from enforcing the law and also to declare the law unconstitutional and unenforceable.[41] Harris has yet to answer the Complaint.


*Krista Irons, a law student at Brooklyn Law School, was GSB’s fall 2016 legal extern who worked out of its New York office.

[1] Allie Gimmel, How California’s New IMDb Age Law Helps Actors In More Ways Than One, Bustle, (Oct. 12, 2016, 12:59PM), http://www.bustle.com/articles/186069-how-californias-new-imdb-age-law-helps-actors-in-more-ways-than-one.

[2] Andrew Pulver, Law Passed Enabling Actors to Remove Age from IMDb, The Guardian, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:01PM), https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/sep/26/law-passed-enabling-actors-to-remove-age-from-imdb.

[3] 29 U.S.C.S. § 621 (West 2016).

[4] 29 U.S.C.S. § 621 (West 2016).

[5] 29 U.S.C.S. § 623 (West 2016).

[6] Nassiri Law, Hollywood Age Discrimination Target of Bill, Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:03PM), http://www.orangecountyemploymentlawyersblog.com/2016/08/21/hollywood-age-discrimination-target-of-bill/.

[7] Scott Mendelson, At Age 32, Is Anne Hathaway Already Too Old To Be A Movie Star?, Forbes, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:11PM), http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2015/09/07/on-anne-hathaway-and-the-jennifer-lawrence-problem/#4679dd0f789e.

[8] Chris Eggertsen, Elizabeth Banks: I was told I was ‘too old’ to Play Mary Jane in ‘Spider-Man’, HitFix, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:06PM), http://www.hitfix.com/the-dartboard/elizabeth-banks-i-was-told-i-was-too-old-to-play-mary-jane-in-spider-man.

[9] Id.

[10] Chris Eggertsen, Olivia Wilde: ‘Too old’ to play Leonardo DiCaprio’s wife in ‘Wolf of Wall Street’, HitFix, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:09PM), http://www.hitfix.com/news/olivia-wilde-i-was-deemed-too-old-to-play-leonardo-dicaprios-wife-in-wolf-of-wall-street.

[11] Id.

[12] Huong Hoang v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. C11-1709MJP, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190477, at *2-3 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 18, 2013).

[13] Id. at *4-5.

[14] Id.

[15] Id. at *7.

[16] Id. at *2-3.

[17] Id. at *17.

[18] Id. at *4-5.

[19] Id. at *2-3.

[20] Huong Hoang v. IMDb.com, Inc., 599 F. App’x 674, 675 (9th Cir. 2015), aff’g, Huong Hoang v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. C11-1709MJP, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190477 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 18, 2013).

[21] Acting Unions Criticise IMDb in Age Row, BBC, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:20PM), http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-15492579.

[22] Huong, 599 F. App’x at 4, n. 1 (9th Cir. 2015).

[23] Id.

[24] Id.

[25] AFTRA, SAG Urge IMDb To Stop Facilitating Age Discrimination Against Actors, Deadline, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:22PM), http://deadline.com/2011/10/aftra-sag-urge-imdb-to-stop-facilitating-age-discrimination-against-actors-188031/.

[26] Acting Unions Criticise IMDb in Age Row, BBC, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:20PM), http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-15492579.

[27] S. AB 1687 Gen. Assemb., Reg. Sess. (Ca. 2016). Available at: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB1687.

[28] Id.

[29] Id.

[30] Id.

[31] Gabrielle Carteris, SAG-AFTRA’s Gabrielle Carteris: Actors Need a Law to Keep Ages Off IMDb, The Hollywood Reporter, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:28PM), http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sag-aftras-gabrielle-carteris-actors-922253.

[32] Id.

[33] Id.

[34] Michael Beckerman, Law to Keep Actor Ages Off IMDb “Suppresses Free Speech”, The Hollywood Reporter, (Oct. 12, 2016, 1:30PM), http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/law-keep-actor-ages-imdb-924441

[35] Id.

[36] Id.

[37] Id.

[38] Id.

[39] Alex Dobuzinskis, Revealing an Actor’s Age, Metro, (Nov. 21, 2016, 1:43PM), http://www.metro.us/entertainment/revealing-an-actor-s-age-is-illegal-imdb-website-sues-california/fIqpkk—lhQ_JP80PVSlPiCkKbmzWw/.

[40] Id.

[41] Ashley Cullins, IMDb Sues to Invalidate California’s Actor Age Censorship Law, The Hollywood Reporter, (Nov. 21, 2016, 1:45PM), http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/imdb-sues-invalidate-californias-actor-age-censorship-law-946261.

Written by:

Garvey Schubert Barer

Garvey Schubert Barer on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.