A “Dirty” Lawsuit: How a Sex Scandal Could Impact Online Defamation Law

by Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP
Contact

A former high school teacher and NFL cheerleader sleeps with her student.  She faces widespread scorn, including scathing Internet comments.  Despite the scorn, she becomes engaged to the student.

It sounds like the plot of a made-for-TV movie.  But these facts form the basis of a landmark defamation lawsuit that could have ramifications for any website that allows users to post comments.

The Story

Sarah Jones is a former high school teacher and Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader.  She had a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old student.  They later became engaged.  (There are engagement photos to prove it.)

Nik Richie operates the gossip site “thedirty.com.”  In that role, he screens user posts, rejecting some and allowing others to be published.  He also sometimes adds his own comments to the posts.

A commenter to the thedirty.com posted a message stating that Jones had “slept with every other Bengal Football player.”  Jones requested that the post be removed; the website refused.

A few weeks later, a commenter to the same website posted another comment stating that Jones’ boyfriend “tested positive for Chlamydia Infection and Gonorrhea.. so im sure Sarah also has both.”  Richie wrote in response: “Why are all high school teachers freaks in the sack?”  Jones again requested that the posts be removed; the website ignored her requests.

The Lawsuit

Jones filed suit against Richie and the website, alleging that the comments were defamatory.  Richie and the website conceded that the comments were facially defamatory, but responded that they were not liable under the Communications Decency Act.

As this blog has discussed previously, the CDA immunizes providers of interactive computer services against liability arising from content crated by third parties.  This grant of immunity applies only if the interactive computer service provider is not also an “information content provider”— i.e., someone who is “responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development” of the offending content.

The immunity provided by the CDA is broad, and “[t]ypically, cases involving claims like Jones’ against websites are quickly dismissed.”  However, in one of the few cases to narrow the protections of the CDA, a federal district court has ruled that the defendants were not immune from liability.

The court found that a website operator forfeits immunity under the CDA if it “encouraged development” of the offensive content in question.  The court then held that “by reason of the very name of the site, the manner in which it is managed, and the personal comments of Richie, the defendants have specifically encouraged development of what is offensive about the content of the site.”

The court found that several factors support this conclusion.  First, the name of the site—“the dirty.com”—“in and of itself encourages the posting only of ‘dirt.’”  Second, Richie screened the posts, publishing some and deleting others.  Third, Richie added his own comments to certain posts.  Fourth, Richie referred to “fans of the site” as “the Dirty Army,” writing: “I love how the Dirty Army has war mentality.”

The Appeal

Richie and the website appealed the decision.  Signifying the importance of the case, prominent Internet companies, including Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Yahoo, Twitter and eBay, filed briefs in support of Richie.

The defendants argued that the district court erred by applying the “encouraged development” test.  They maintained that the district court should have followed other appellate courts in finding that a website is immune from liability under the CDA unless it “contributes materially” to the alleged offensive content—a more difficult standard to meet.

The Internet companies agreed, arguing that the district court’s decision to adopt the “encouraged development” standard “significantly depart[ed] from the settled interpretation of [the CDA] and, if adopted by this Court, would not only contravene Congress’s policies as declared in the statute, but also introduce substantial uncertainty regarding a law that has been a pillar for the growth and success of America’s Internet industry.”

Jones countered that the “encouraged development” test was correct, and that Richie “developed the site to encourage defamatory material.”  Jones maintained that, by adding his own comments to the offensive posts, Richie adopted them as his own.

A panel of appellate judges heard oral arguments in the case on May 1.  The judges observed, and Jones’ attorney acknowledged, that the district court in this case is alone in adopting the “encouraged development” test.  The judges’ questions also indicated that they believe that the “encouraged development” test is inconsistent with the “contributes materially” test adopted by other circuits.

The judges likely will not issue a decision for months.  However, judges are loath to create a circuit split, and their questions indicate they probably will reverse the district court.

In the likely event that the court reverses, Jones will have little to cheer.  But websites such as Facebook and Google will breathe a sigh of relief.  As Richie’s attorney said: “All websites rise and sink by the same tide.  To take the CDA away from [The Dirty] — even if you don’t like that site — opens the flood gates for people to sue every website that hosts third party content.”

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP
Contact
more
less

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.