A Glimpse under the Hood: How the USPTO Proposes to Adjust Patent Fees

by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

[author Kevin E. Noonan]


In what was an object of great controversy, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act grants the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office the authority to "set or adjust by rule any fee established, authorized, or charged under title 35, United States Code, or the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.), for any services performed by or materials furnished by, the Office" (Sec. 10(a)(1)).  This authority is limited by many other provisions of the bill, including oversight by the Patent Public Advisory Committee (Sec. 10(d)), publication in the Federal Register for public comment (Sec. 10(e)), and is subject to being overruled by Congress (Sec. 10(f)).  The most immediate check on the Director's authority is set forth in paragraph (2) of Section 10(a), whereby the Director can set or adjust fees "only to recover the aggregate estimated costs to the Office for processing, activities, services, and materials relating to patents (in the case of patent fees) and trademarks (in the case of trademark fees), including administrative costs of the Office with respect to such patent or trademark fees (as the case may be)."

The Director has taken this requirement seriously, as evidenced by the detailed appendices provided with his proposal to adjust fees submitted to the PPAC last month (see "USPTO Proposes Fee Changes").

The "USPTO Funding Model" analogizes the Office to a business, insofar as the shareholders (i.e., the public) requests products and services "according to established performance metrics."  "Aggregate costs . . . are funded from the aggregate revenue."  The Office provides context:  "[a]pplication rates increase each year," but the fees collected defray "less than one half the cost [for] prosecut[ing] the application[s]."  Office operations are "subsidized" by issue fee and patent maintenance fees; this reality complicates the budgeting process because of variability between revenue generating activities (allowance and patent maintenance) and revenue consuming activities (application examination).  The Office provides a chart depicting certain of these relationships:

Slide 1

This relationship was modified by the AIA, according to the Office:

Slide 2

The Office then sets out the goals fee setting intends to accomplish:

• Accelerate the Office's progress in reducing the backlog of unexamined patent applications and reducing patent application pendency to bring more quality products to market within the timeframes demanded by patent applicants and owners and the public;

• Realign the fee structure to add processing options during patent application prosecution; and

• Put the Office on a path to financial sustainability.

These goals were motivated by objectives, including:  1) promoting the strategy for American innovation ("promoting competitive markets that spur productive entrepreneurship," "foster innovation that will lead to technologies of the future," and "encourage high-growth and innovation-based small business entrepreneurship"); 2) aligning fees with the "full cost" of products and services provided by the Office (from historical information and in view of the Office's "strategic objectives"); 3) setting fees "to facilitate the effective administration of the patent and trademark systems," including, perhaps ominously, "encouraging the prompt conclusion of application prosecution"; and 4) offering application processing options (including various "processing choices" for applicants).  The Office used a number of analytical tools in making its fee setting decisions, including (in addition to budget formulations and economic analyses) the historical costs to the Office, the objectives of strategic planning, production workloads, and legal and policy analysis, and then proposed an iterative fee setting methodology using feedback from actual experience to "readjust" fees as needed.  These individual components were split out in separate appendices.

The Office provides one example of how it estimates the financial "risks" using this approach:

• If: Application filings grow at a rate faster than planned, and maintenance fees (which subsidize search and exam fees) do not; or If: Maintenance fee collections are realized at a rate lower than planned;

• Then: The USPTO will realize a financial risk that may impact the Office's ability to continue working off the application backlog and/or maintain steady‐state operations.

• A sufficiently funded operating reserve will mitigate this risk until the fee structure can be recalibrated using AIA Section 10 fee setting guidelines.

The Appendices are chock full of interesting information, such as the balance between regulatory (20%) and statutory (80%) fees in the total revenue collected by the Office, despite the fact that of the 242 fees charged by the Office, 41% were regulatory fees.  Also included are the Office's plans for reducing the patent application backlog:

Patent Pendency and Backlog Reduction

• By the end of FY 2013, the USPTO expects to spend $1.7 billion with about 10,400 personnel on board for patent examining activities.

• This includes hiring 1,500 new patent examiners during FY 2013.  With this hiring, the USPTO will have hired more than 3,800 patent examiners since FY 2011 to expand examination capacity sufficient to reduce the application backlog and maintain pendency thereafter.

• The additional revenue generated with the proposed fee structure will enable the USPTO to continue paying for this increased examination capacity in the out years.

• Increased production units and reduced patent pendency and application backlog are the most significant benefits realized from generating and using these additional resources.  The chart on the following page outlines the annual improvements to reach a 10.1 months average first action pendency in FY 2015, an 18.3 months average total pendency by FY 2016, and reducing the patent application backlog in half by FY 2015.

Slide 3

The proposed fee structure also depends on the projected number of application fees, publication fees, maintenance fees, and "other" fees to be collected:

Slide 4

And the Office provides its rationale for why certain fees are increased (or not); for example:

Slide 5
Slide 6
Slide 7

(where the changes in extension of time fees and RCE fees are expressly intended to "facilitate and efficient and prompt conclusion of application processing").

Finally, the Office provides "other resources," including the FY2010 – FY2015 Strategic Plan; the President's FY 2013 Budget, and the Administration's Strategy for American Innovation.

What is remarkable, commendable, and noteworthy about these efforts by the Office is the apparent level of transparency into how the Office is proposing to exercise its new authority.  The patenting public cannot effectively comment on whether the proposed fees are appropriate without this kind of information, and while this might be expected to be self-evident, it is contrary to the conventional bureaucratic reflex to reveal an agency's thinking to this extent.  For this, Office personnel should be commended, while at the same time its assumptions and proposals should be critically examined and feedback fulsomely provided.  But at least we have the tools to do so, and kudos to the Office for providing them.

For additional information regarding this topic, please see:

• "USPTO Proposes Fees Changes," March 1, 2012
• "USPTO News Briefs," February 20, 2012
• "PPAC to Hold Public Hearings on Proposed Fee Schedule," February 1, 2012


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.