Act 6/91 Update

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Contact

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an opinion that sets forth a new interpretation of Act 6.  It may adversely impact some pending consumer foreclosure actions, and it changes the notice requirements on subsequent consumer foreclosure filings.  I have attached the case of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Louis Spivak, 2014 Pa.Super. 250 (2014) (See link below) in which the appellate court held, “… when a residential mortgagee delivers an Act 6 notice prior to a residential foreclosure, commences a foreclosure action against a mortgagor (“first action”), discontinues that foreclosure action, and re-files another foreclosure action against a mortgagor for the same premises (“second action”), the lack of a new notice prior to the second action is fatal to the second action.”  In other words, you will now need to send a new Act 6 notice if you are filing a new foreclosure case.  You can no longer use the previous letter.   So, prior to restarting a residential foreclosure action in Pennsylvania, if Act 6 applies to the case, a new Act 6 notice is now required.  Importantly, please note that attorney fees and costs cannot be included in these Act 6 letters.  See 41 P.S. §406(3).

Wells Fargo v Spivak 2014 Pa Super 250

 

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Tucker Arensberg, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
Contact
more
less

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide