Additional Changes to Alberta's Business Corporations Act Now in Effect

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

[co-author: Ryan Amaral - Summer Student]

The Alberta Government's Business Corporations Amendment Act, 2021 (formerly Bill 84), which we wrote on in our previous insight Additional Changes Coming to Alberta's Business Corporations Act, was proclaimed into force on May 31, 2022. The amendments to the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) (ABCA) made by Bill 84 are consistent with amendments made through the Red Tape Reduction Implementation Act, 2020, as discussed in Important Changes to the Alberta Business Corporations Act Now in Effect. The amendments, generally, modernize the ABCA, afford additional flexibility to corporations, directors and shareholders in organizing their affairs and reduce regulatory and administrative burdens for Alberta corporations, all with the objective of retaining existing businesses in, and attracting new businesses to, Alberta.

Key Amendments

The Amendments:

  • modify certain directors' responsibilities and protections;
  • expand court discretion in relation to plans of arrangement;
  • reduce administrative burdens for private corporations (for example, by permitting auditor waivers and written shareholder resolutions to be passed by specified majorities, rather than unanimously); and
  • modernize outdated requirements and definitions and provide for increased corporate flexibility.

Modify Directors' and Officers' Responsibilities and Protections

Opportunities to Participate in Corporate Opportunities—Waivers.

The corporate opportunity doctrine provides that, generally, directors and officers, in their capacities as fiduciaries to a corporation, may not take advantage of a business opportunity available to such corporation. However, the Amendments permit a corporation to waive any interest or expectancy in or to a corporate opportunity offered to it or its officers, directors or shareholders. This expands the ability of these parties to pursue opportunities that may have previously been unavailable to them under the corporate opportunity doctrine. It was anticipated that corresponding amendments to the Business Corporations Regulation would set out the particulars of when a corporation may waive its interest in corporate opportunities, however, no such particulars have been published for now. As a result, uncertainty remains over how a corporation may use and implement waivers of corporate opportunities.

While corporate opportunity waivers are permitted in various U.S. jurisdictions, Alberta has become the first jurisdiction in Canada to afford latitude to corporations in that regard.

Material Contracts and Transactions

The ABCA generally requires directors and officers to disclose an interest in a material contract or transaction and prohibits directors from voting on resolutions to approve such material contract or transaction, subject to certain exemptions. The Amendments allow a director to vote on resolutions to approve a material contract or transaction to the extent that the director's interest would benefit the corporation. This amendment would apply, for example, in the context of a director guaranteeing a loan to the corporation. The Amendments also extend the requirement to disclose an interest in a material contract or transaction to persons who act in the capacity of a director or officer, as if that person were a director or officer.

Due Diligence Defence: Good Faith

The ABCA provides that directors will not be liable for breach of the duty of care if the director demonstrates that he/she relied in good faith on opinions and reports of certain experts, such as lawyers, accountants, engineers, appraisers and other professionals. The Amendments expand this protection to include reliance on an opinion or report of a "person, including … an employee of the corporation, whose profession or expertise lends credibility to a statement made by that person."

Enhanced Indemnification and Insurance

Under the ABCA, a corporation may, generally, indemnify a director or officer for costs incurred in connection with a civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding to which the director or officer is made a party, provided the director or officer acted in good faith, believed his/her conduct was lawful and was substantially successful on the merits of his/her defence of the action or proceeding and was fully and reasonably entitled to indemnity. The Amendments enhance the protection of directors by expanding indemnification to apply (i) to investigations or other actions or proceedings, (ii) to investigations/actions/proceedings where the director is involved in, but is not a formal party to, the investigation, action or proceeding and (iii) in cases where the director was not judged by a court or competent authority to have committed any fault or omitted to do anything that the director ought to have done, rather than the more onerous standard of being substantially successful on the merits in the director's defence of the action and being fairly and reasonably entitled to an indemnity. In addition, the Amendments expand the ability of a corporation to purchase and maintain officers' and directors' insurance in certain circumstances.

The Amendments also specifically provide that shareholders party to a unanimous shareholder agreement may "fetter" their discretion when exercising the powers of directors under such unanimous shareholder agreement.

Expand Court Discretion Regarding Plans of Arrangement

A plan of arrangement is a court supervised and approved procedure (governed by the applicable corporate statute, such as the ABCA), under which corporations may complete a wide range of transactions, including mergers and acquisitions and reorganizations.

Completing a plan of arrangement under the federal Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) has, in certain circumstances, been viewed as more favourable and flexible than under the ABCA, especially in the context of corporate debt restructurings, as the CBCA (i) does not explicitly require shareholder approval (even though the provision's breadth encompasses certain corporate transactions that would require shareholder approval if completed outside of an arrangement); and (ii) provides that a court may grant a stay of proceedings at the time the plan of arrangement proceedings begin, allowing the corporation to focus strictly on such proceedings.

The Amendments provide a court with increased discretion, including the ability to make any order "it thinks fit" in connection with a plan of arrangement, which would allow the court to grant a request for a stay of proceedings if the corporate applicant so requests, and to approve a plan of arrangement without first obtaining shareholder approval.

Reducing Administrative Burdens for Private Corporations

The Amendments allow the administration of private corporations to be more streamlined and flexible, including by (i) reducing the threshold for approval of a written shareholder resolution from unanimity to two-thirds of the shareholders entitled to vote on the resolution; (ii) reducing the threshold for passage of a resolution to dispense with the appointment of an auditor from unanimity to two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote the resolution (unless it is to be passed by written resolution, in which case it will need to be signed by all of the shareholders entitled to vote on the resolution); and (iii) permitting a corporation to shorten the notice period for shareholders' meetings from a minimum of 21 days and a maximum of 50 days, to a minimum of seven days and a maximum of 60 days.

Modernize Outdated Requirements, Definitions and Increase Flexibility

Extend the Time Period to Revive a Dissolved Corporation

The Amendments increase the length of the window during which a corporation may be revived following dissolution (from the current five years to 10 years, measured from the date of dissolution each case), thereby providing additional time to recommence a business, collect assets or resolve legal issues.

Modernizing the ABCA

The Amendments modernize the ABCA by removing multiple outdated or redundant provisions. Among other things, the amendments contemplate (i) removal of the requirement to publish the record date of a shareholders' meeting (which requirement will continue to apply to reporting issuers under the rules of stock exchanges); (ii) replacement of the defined term "distributing corporation" with "reporting issuer" (which takes its meaning from applicable securities laws in Canada); (iii) the issuance of securities certificates in electronic form, (iv) voice votes at shareholder meetings, rather than a show of hands (which change is compatible with earlier ABCA amendments to facilitate virtual meetings); (v) expand acceptable contact information to include email; and (vi) deletion of references to faxed and handwritten documents.

Expand Insider Trading Provisions

The ABCA restricts "insiders" (as defined in the ABCA) from making use of confidential corporate information in the context of acquisitions and dispositions of securities of the corporation. These provisions are similar to, but different than, the insider trading provisions set out in applicable securities laws in Canada.

The Amendments expand the definition of "insider" to include (i) a person who received confidential information while a designated insider, such as a director, officer or 10 percent shareholder of a corporation; and (ii) in certain circumstances, a person who proposes to make a takeover bid for shares of a corporation or to enter into a business combination with the corporation. The insider trading prohibition has also been expanded to include a trade in a security of another entity whose value is significantly dependent on the value of the securities of the corporation, such as a material subsidiary trading in the securities of its parent company.

The Amendments also modify the insider trading defence set out in Section 130 of the ABCA. Previously, the ABCA provided that an insider was not liable (under Section 130) in circumstances where the relevant information was known, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been known, to the other party to the trade. As a result of the Amendments, an insider will not be liable to the other party to the trade if the insider reasonably believed that the relevant information had been generally disclosed or that the information was known, or ought reasonably to have been known, to that party.

Amendments to the Regulation

Amendments to the Business Corporations Regulation were also proclaimed into force on May 31, 2022. These amendments reduce the administrative burden for SEC Registrants (which are subject to U.S. accounting standards) by exempting them from the requirement to prepare additional financial records under Canadian accounting principles when filing annual returns and presenting annual financial statements for their Alberta corporation provided they contain a note stating whether the statements were prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP or U.S. GAAP.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bennett Jones LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.