Advertising Law - October 14, 2011

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact

In This Issue:

SPECIAL FOCUS: Avoiding Potential Pitfalls Associated with Functional Food Claims; Lather Up: FDA Issues New Sunscreen Rules; Facebook “Likes” Two Legal Victories; NAD: Claims Should Be Based on Product Testing, Not Testing of Individual Ingredients; and Lawmakers Contact FTC Over “Supercookies” and OnStar.

SPECIAL FOCUS: Avoiding Potential Pitfalls Associated with Functional Food Claims Functional foods – or foods often fortified with nutrients that offer functional benefits – are among the fastest-growing categories of foods, but as their popularity increases, so too does scrutiny over whether these foods truly provide all of their claimed health benefits. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have increased their enforcement efforts against these products, and it seems that nearly every week another food company is challenging its competitors’ claims in court or before the National Advertising Division (NAD).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact
more
less

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide