Alien Tort Case Development: Plaintiffs in Exxon Mobil Case Survive “Touch and Concern” Review

by Foley Hoag LLP - Corporate Social Responsibility
Contact

Earlier this month, the District Court for the District of Columbia denied Exxon Mobil’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims in Doe I v. Exxon Mobil, a case brought pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”). Plaintiffs allege that Exxon Mobil should be held liable for aiding and abetting human rights abuses committed by members of the Indonesian military. The abuses were allegedly committed while the military was providing security for the company’s operations in the Aceh Province of Indonesia in 2000 and 2001.

In September 2014, the District Court had allowed plaintiffs to file for leave to amend their complaint in order to try and demonstrate that the facts of the case sufficiently “touch and concern” the United States so as to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality that applies to ATS cases pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum. In its most recent decision, the District Court found that plaintiffs had pled sufficient facts so as to overcome the presumption with regard to Exxon Mobil Corporation, but not with regard to the company’s Indonesian subsidiary.

Noting that the “primary inquiry in deciding whether the presumption against extraterritoriality is displaced is the location of the conduct at issue,” the Court found that plaintiffs had made “numerous and detailed allegations” that Exxon Mobil executives based in the United States had made decisions regarding the deployment of military security personnel in Indonesia.

The Court cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. Nat’l Australian Bank (2010) in stating that “actions that are part of a course of conduct constituting a violation of customary international law are relevant to the congressional focus in passing the ATS and are relevant in determining whether a plaintiff’s claims sufficiently touch and concern the United States[.]”  Citing the Eleventh Circuit’s March 2015 decision in Doe v. Drummond, the Court stated that, in order to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality, there should be “specific, substantial allegations of conduct occurring in the United States that support an ATS cause of action[,]” although the “U.S.-based conduct need not allege a completed tort under the ATS[.]”

Plaintiffs had specifically alleged that Exxon Mobil executives in the United States had received reports that human rights abuses were being committed by security personnel in Indonesia, on Exxon property and using Exxon equipment, prior to the incidents involving the plaintiffs.  The Court found that the fact that Exxon Mobil executives knew of past crimes by security personnel “like those at issue in this case satisfies the requirement that the [company] have known the essential elements of the crimes committed and the intent of the principal perpetrators.” Thus the mens rea, or state of mind, for aiding and abetting liability has been established.

The Court found that the actus reus for aiding and abetting liability was supported, in part, through plaintiffs’ specific allegations of U.S.-based decision-making by Exxon Mobil executives.  The Court noted that “these allegations are likely insufficient, without allegations of Indonesia-based conduct, to state a claim for aiding and abetting liability” but “the nature of aiding and abetting liability demonstrates that the site of decision making is relevant to the actus reus of the offense and, therefore, to the extraterritoriality inquiry.” Specifically, “[d]ecisions to provide assistance that will have a substantial effect on a violation of customary international law are part of a course of conduct that gives rise to a claim for aiding and abetting under the ATS.”

The Court also found, in accordance with the Eleventh Circuit in Drummond and the Fourth Circuit in Al Shimari v. CACI, that a defendant’s U.S. citizenship or corporate status is a “relevant consideration” in applying the touch and concern test, although it is not sufficient to establish jurisdiction.

The decision in Doe v. Exxon Mobil is significant in that it found that U.S.-based decision-making, while not necessarily sufficient to state a claim for aiding and abetting, may be sufficient to provide the jurisdictional “hook” that plaintiffs need in order to ensure that ATS claims can be properly brought in U.S. court. It is notable, however, that plaintiffs were able to provide evidence of U.S.-based decision-making on the basis of the types of discovery findings that would not necessarily be available to plaintiffs in seeking to survive a motion to dismiss in future cases. As federal courts continue to determine the parameters of the “touch and concern” standard set forth in Kiobel, this decision is likely to be a key reference point for both plaintiffs and defendants alike.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Corporate Social Responsibility | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Corporate Social Responsibility
Contact
more
less

Foley Hoag LLP - Corporate Social Responsibility on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.