Another Court Dismisses Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit for Lack of Standing

Alston & Bird
Contact

In what appears to be a growing trend, another federal district court has dismissed a data breach case for lack of standing. In Springmeyer et al. v. Marriott International, Inc., 2021 WL 809894 (D. Md.), Plaintiffs, former guests of Marriott hotels, sued Marriott in connection with a data breach affecting over 5 million guests. Marriott moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint for lack of standing and failure to state a claim. The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims for lack of standing, holding that Plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege that their alleged injuries were fairly traceable to Marriott’s conduct—an essential element of standing.

When “the actions of a third party are involved,” Article III requires a plaintiff to allege his injury “can be traced to the challenged action of the defendant” rather than “from the independent action of some third party not before the court.”  Id. at *2.  According to the Court, this meant Plaintiffs “must allege facts for the Court to plausibly infer that the unauthorized access of [the Plaintiffs’ personal information] by an unspecified bad actor or actors” is fairly traceable to Marriott’s conduct.  Id. at *3.  Plaintiffs attempted to meet their burden by alleging that that their injuries resulted from “Marriott’s failure to implement adequate and reasonable cyber-security procedures and protocols necessary to protect its guests’” personal information, but those allegations were entirely conclusory.  Id.  Plaintiffs did not, for example, “allege any facts about what measures Marriott did or did not take to protect PII, what alleged inadequacies in its systems it should have disclosed, what ‘standard and reasonably available steps’ existed that Marriott did not take, how Marriott failed to detect the data breach, or why it did not provide timely and accurate notice of the breach.”   Id.  In other words, Plaintiff’s allegations created no “plausible connection” between Plaintiffs’ alleged injuries and Marriott’s alleged security deficiencies.  Id.  at *4.  As a result, the Court held that Plaintiffs’ alleged injuries were not fairly traceable to Marriott and dismissed the complaint with prejudice for lack of Article III standing.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Alston & Bird | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Alston & Bird
Contact
more
less

Alston & Bird on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.