Asbestos Alert: Washington State Extends Asbestos Exposure Liability to Manufacturers of Certain Non-Asbestos Containing Products

by Low, Ball & Lynch

[author: Guy W. Stilson]

Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.
Washington State Supreme Court 2012 WL 3207245 (August 9, 2012)

Washington law generally does not extend liability for asbestos-related diseases to defendants who did not place an asbestos-containing product into the stream of commerce. Macias was a tool keeper whose job duties included cleaning respirators and changing respirator cartridges. He claimed the respirator manufacturers had a duty to warn him that handling the respirators after they had been used could lead to exposure to asbestos and resultant asbestos-related disease. The trial court denied the respirator manufacturers’ summary judgment motions. The court of appeal reversed because the respirator manufacturers were not in the chain of distribution of asbestos-containing products. The Washington Supreme Court reversed the court of appeal and reinstated the trial court’s order denying the summary judgment motions.

The Washington Supreme Court distinguished the precedent it had set in Simonetta v. Viad Corporation (2008) 197 P.3d 127 and Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings (2008) 198 P.3d 493. These were cases where equipment manufacturing defendants were found not liable for asbestos exposure from external insulation and internal packing and gaskets used in conjunction with those defendants’ products and not supplied by them. Those cases held that a defendant must be in the chain of distribution of the harm-producing agent in order to be held strictly liable.

In Macias the Court reasoned that Simonetta and Braaten stated a general rule subject to exception in certain cases. The Court found that, because the danger Mr. Macias encountered was “based on the characteristics of the [respirator] manufacturers’ own products,” liability for failure to warn could apply to them. The characteristics of the respirators which the Court found important were that they were designed to filter contaminants from the air, specifically including asbestos; they were designed to be reused; and integral to their reuse, the respirators had to be cleaned of the contaminants from the last use, which involved handling of the dirty respirators and created an opportunity for exposure. In other words, the respirators, when used as designed, would cause the persons charged with cleaning them to be exposed to asbestos unless precautions were taken.

The Court took pains to note that it was not overturning or weakening Simonetta or Braaten, “because unlike in those cases, where the manufacturers’ products did not, in and of themselves, pose any inherent danger of exposure to asbestos, here when the products were used exactly as intended and cleaned for reuse exactly as intended they inherently and invariably posed the danger of exposure to asbestos.”

Comment and Evaluation

The California decision in O’Neil v. Crane Co. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 335 held that product manufacturers do not have liability for exposure caused by replacement parts which they did not supply. In reaching that conclusion, the O’Neil court cited Simonetta and Braaten, and also the Washington Court of Appeal’s earlier decision on the Macias case (Macias v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (2010) 244 P.3d 978). Naturally, the question arises as to whether the Washington Supreme Court’s Macias opinion undermines the holding of O’Neil.

While the Washington Supreme Court’s new Macias opinion does nothing to strengthen O’Neil, it does not weaken the position that an equipment manufacturer should not be held liable for exposure to external insulation and internal packing and gaskets supplied by others, so long as the equipment manufacturer did not design or manufacture the equipment in such a way that exposure to asbestos was an inherent risk.

The O’Neil court certainly suggested that if a particular piece of equipment was required to be used in conjunction with another product that had to be asbestos-containing, there was a possibility of liability against the supplier of the non-asbestos-containing piece of equipment. However, O’Neil made clear that this would be a very rare circumstance, a position which was bolstered by Barker v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 140. In Barker, the manufacturer of a brake grinding machine was found not liable, despite the fact that the machine was used on asbestos-containing brake linings and would cause the release of asbestos fibers from those brake linings. The Barker court distinguished its holding from that of Tellez-Cordova v. Campbell-Hausfeld (2004) 129 Cal.App.4th 577 on the ground that in Tellez-Cordova, the defendant’s product was manufactured specifically for a use that necessarily resulted in the release of toxic substances. In our view, the Washington Supreme Court’s decision in Macias falls into the Tellez-Cordova-type of case, where exposure to a harmful substance is inherent, as opposed to the Barker-type of case where such exposure is likely but not inherent. In-depth analysis of each of these cases will be needed to provide guidance to trial judges.

For the full decision see:  


Low, Ball & Lynch’s Environmental and Toxic Torts Team has been successfully representing defendants in asbestos-related litigation for over 25 years. The Environmental and Toxic Torts Team also handles cases involving chemical spills and toxicity, lead, silica, and Proposition 65.

Contact us: Sonja Blomquist, and Guy Stilson, | Phone: 415.981.6630 | Fax: 415.399.1506


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Low, Ball & Lynch | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Low, Ball & Lynch

Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.