Be Careful With That Power of Attorney!: Arbitration Clauses and Nursing Home Lawsuits

by LeClairRyan
Contact

On May 15, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its opinion in Kindred Nursing Centers, L.P. v. Clark This case addressed the issue of whether an agent acting pursuant to a power of attorney could bind an estate to an arbitration agreement.

The facts of the case were simple.  Beverly and Janis, family members of Joe and Olive respectively, each held their family member’s respective power of attorney.  Joe and Olive moved into a nursing home operated by Kindred Nursing Centers, L.P. (“Kindred”).  Beverly and Janis used their family members’ powers of attorney to sign an arbitration agreement, on behalf of Joe and Olive.  Arbitration is the process by which parties use a third-party person (rather than a court) to decide their claims. The agreements at issue in the case stated that Joe and Olive agreed to arbitrate all claims arising from their stay at the nursing home (rather than file a lawsuit).  Joe and Olive later died.

Beverly and Janis both brought claims alleging that their family members’ deaths were caused by Kindred’s substandard care.  Kindred moved to dismiss based on the arbitration agreement.  The trial court in Kentucky denied Kindred’s motions to dismiss.  The Kentucky Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court.  The Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed and held that the arbitration agreements were invalid because the powers of attorney did not specifically grant the agents the authority to enter into arbitration agreements.  The Kentucky Supreme Court further stated that the Kentucky Constitution provided that a person’s rights to juries and the courts were “inviolate” and “sacred”.  The Kentucky Supreme Court held that an agent could not bind a person to arbitration unless the power of attorney specifically addressed the ability of the agent to sign an arbitration agreement.

The Supreme Court of the United States (the “Court”) granted certiorari and reversed the Kentucky Supreme Court.  In its analysis, the Court stated that the Kentucky Supreme Court’s opinion violated the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”) by singling out arbitration agreements for disfavored treatment.

As background, the FAA is a federal act that is aimed at upholding arbitration agreements.  Arbitration is seen by many as a more favorable option to large corporations and entities, compared to litigating consumer claims in court.  Arbitration is favored by large corporations because it helps reduce the amount of litigation and attorney’s fees incurred in defending claims.  Critics of arbitration allege that it can be expensive and burdensome on the part of plaintiffs.  For example, arbitration agreements may limit the time within which plaintiffs may make a claim, require plaintiffs to travel, and sometimes require the plaintiffs to help pay the cost of the arbitrator.

The FAA’s main effect, as codified at 9 U.S.C. § 2, provides in part that “an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract, transaction, or refusal, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”  In other words, arbitration agreements are valid unless there are grounds for invalidating it, just as any other contract.  Since most people do not read every word of every contract they enter, the FAA can be an unpleasant surprise to many plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ attorneys.

The FAA does not just apply to federal contracts.  The FAA works to preempt (override) any inconsistent state rule that discriminates against arbitration agreements.  The FAA requires that arbitration agreements be treated the same as all other contracts.  For example, a state would violate the FAA if it passed a law that said “all arbitration agreements are invalid.”

The Court found that the Kentucky Supreme Court’s refusal to place the arbitration agreements on the same level as contracts violated the FAA.  Instead of treating the arbitration agreements the same as any other contract, the Kentucky Supreme Court’s opinion “specially impeded the ability of attorneys-in-fact to enter into arbitration agreements.”  The Court made it clear that states cannot single out arbitration agreements for greater scrutiny than run-of-the-mill contracts.  Since the Kentucky Supreme Court analyzed the bindingness of arbitration agreements (by considering a power of attorney’s specific authority to do so) entered into by agents under a power of attorney, it conceptually singled out arbitration agreements. This analysis, according to the Court, was impermissible under the FAA.

Ultimately, the Court reversed, in part, and vacated, in part, the judgment of the Kentucky Supreme Court.  The Court enforced Olive’s arbitration agreement because the state court found that her power of attorney was broad enough to execute the arbitration agreement.  The Court noted that the Kentucky Supreme Court violated the FAA because it refused to enforce Olive’s arbitration agreement only because there was no specific authority to enter into the arbitration agreement (thereby singling out arbitration agreements from regular contracts).  The Court remanded the issue of Joe’s arbitration agreement because the state court did not find that his power of attorney was broad enough to permit the execution of the arbitration agreement.

The Clark opinion, while interpreting in part the Kentucky Constitution, has a national impact. While it appears there is still an argument that a power of attorney may not be sufficiently broad enough to bind an estate to arbitration, the Clark opinion makes equally clear that it is possible for an agent under a power of attorney to do so.  The Clark opinion is important to both agents acting pursuant to powers of attorney, as well as to the principals of powers of attorney.   In other words, if you appoint an agent pursuant to your power of attorney, they may well bind you and your estate to arbitration.  As the population ages and nursing homes become more ubiquitous, it is likely we will see both (i) an increase in nursing home litigation, and (ii) an effort by nursing homes to include arbitration agreements in their contracts.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© LeClairRyan | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

LeClairRyan
Contact
more
less

LeClairRyan on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.