Better Late Than Never: The California Supreme Court Reverses Itself, Holding That Corporate Policyholders May Assign Insurance Rights Without Insurer Consent

K&L Gates LLP

Asset purchase and sale transactions are a preferred structure for many corporate deals. For a variety of reasons, it may be prudent for businesses or product lines to be transferred through these transactions, and an asset purchase and sale may also be a useful vehicle for internal restructuring. But these deals are not without risks. After a transaction, some purchasers may find themselves deemed to be a “successor” to the liabilities of the seller or otherwise responsible for the liabilities arising out of the seller’s historical operations. These “successors” facing liability for historical operations of a deemed “predecessor” may look to the historical insurance assets of the “predecessor” to defend and indemnify against those liabilities. That is especially true when the “successor” has inherited long-tail liabilities, such as asbestos personal injury claims, that may trigger historical policies issued to the predecessor.

Twelve years ago, in Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.,[1] the California Supreme Court—in a ruling at odds with the majority of other jurisdictions to consider the matter—concluded that a transfer of corporate assets and liabilities from one company to another violated the consent-to-assignment clauses found in many general liability policies, even if the transfer took place after the coverage-triggering event.[2] This created an obvious problem: companies found liable for claims arising out of a predecessor’s historical operations might face the prospect of defending and resolving those claims without assistance from any insurer.

In Fluor Corp. v. Superior Court,[3] the California Supreme Court reversed its decision in Henkel, effectively realigning historical liabilities and insurance assets transferred to a successor corporation as part of a sale of assets.

A review of the Henkel Decision
Henkel arose out of a series of complicated transactions, including the contractual separation of two product lines of what was then a wholly-owned subsidiary of Union Carbide Corporation. In 1977, Union Carbide acquired Amchem Products, Inc., which manufactured and sold agricultural and metallic chemicals.[4] After the acquisition, Amchem Products, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Amchem No. 1”), created a new Delaware corporation of the same name (“Amchem No. 2”). Amchem No. 1 then transferred “all of its rights, title and interest . . . in and to its domestic assets utilized in its metalworking business” to Amchem No. 2.[5] The board of Amchem No. 2 unanimously accepted Amchem No. 1’s transfer of “assets, liabilities and goodwill utilized in its metalworking chemical activities.”[6] Henkel Corporation ultimately became the successor to Amchem No. 2 by its 1980 acquisition of all of Amchem No. 2’s stock and the subsequent merger of the two entities.[7]

Claims arising out of the historical operations of Amchem Products, Inc. were asserted against Henkel in a suit brought by current and former Lockheed employees. The Lockheed plaintiffs alleged injuries arising out of exposure to metallic chemicals between 1959 and 1976. Henkel ultimately settled with the Lockheed plaintiffs for $7.65 million and sued the insurers for declaratory relief.[8]

The California Supreme Court was asked to decide, among other things, whether the rights under the historical Amchem liability insurance policies followed the liabilities so that Henkel could benefit from its predecessor’s coverage. After concluding that Amchem No. 2 (and ultimately Henkel) assumed by contract the historical liabilities at issue in the Lockheed plaintiffs’ suit,[9] the court ruled that Henkel’s rights, as successor to Amchem No. 2, to any benefits under the insurance policies “depend on the terms of the 1979 contract by which Amchem No. 2 acquired the assets of Amchem No. 1.”[10] Ignoring the broad asset transfer language set forth in the board resolutions that formed the basis of the contract between Amchem No. 1 and Amchem No. 2, the court concluded that any contractual assignment “would be invalid because it lacked the insurer’s consent.”[11] The court held that a policy provision purporting to prohibit “assignment of interest” under the policy “without the insurer’s consent endorsed on the policy” was effective to preclude the assignment.[12]

Background Facts in Fluor
The original Fluor Corporation (“Fluor”) performed engineering, procurement, and construction operations for decades, and it commonly operated at sites where asbestos allegedly was used.[13] Since the mid-1980s, various Fluor entities have been named as defendants in numerous asbestos personal injury lawsuits, and a number of those actions are still pending in California and elsewhere.[14]

Between 1971 and 1986, Hartford issued 11 commercial general liability policies to Fluor, which covered, among other things, “personal injury liability.”[15] Fluor tendered its early asbestos lawsuits to Hartford, and Hartford led the defense and settlement of these actions for more than 25 years.[16]

In 2000, Fluor undertook a corporate restructuring known as a “reverse spinoff.” Fluor incorporated a newly formed subsidiary with no prior corporate existence—referred to as “Fluor–2” by the California Supreme Court—which retained the “Fluor Corporation” name to acknowledge continuation of the company’s longstanding engineering, procurement, and construction business.[17] The original Fluor Corporation changed its name to “Massey Energy Company” and, at the same time, transferred all the assets and liabilities related to its engineering, procurement, and construction business to Fluor–2.[18] The new Massey Energy Company retained A.T. Massey’s coal mining business (a mining business Fluor Corporation acquired in the 1980s).[19]

After the reverse spinoff, Fluor–2 operated as the continuation of the original Fluor Corporation’s engineering, procurement, and construction business. Fluor–2 claimed that it was vested with all the assets (including insurance policies) and obligations (including liability relating to the asbestos suits) arising from that business.[20] In May 2001, Fluor–2 notified Hartford of the reverse spinoff. With no objections based on the reverse spinoff, Hartford continued to defend Fluor–2 for about seven years under the original Fluor’s long-expired general liability policies.[21]

Some questions (unrelated to the reverse spinoff) later arose concerning the scope of Hartford’s coverage obligations under the liability policies and, as a result, Fluor–2 sued Hartford in 2006 seeking declaratory relief.[22] Hartford filed a cross-complaint in mid-2009, alleging, for the first time, that the original Fluor Corporation failed to comply with consent-to-assignment clauses contained in each Hartford policy, which state: “Assignment of interest under this policy shall not bind the Company until its consent is endorsed hereon.”[23] Hartford alleged that the reverse spinoff reflected a purported assignment of insurance rights to Fluor–2, and because this was done without Hartford’s consent, the assignment was invalid. Based on this, Hartford sought a declaration that it had no obligation to defend or indemnify Fluor–2; Hartford also asserted unjust enrichment, seeking reimbursement of the payments it had already made on behalf of Fluor–2.[24] The trial court agreed with Hartford, and Fluor–2 then sought review by the court of appeal.

The Court of Appeal’s Decision
When the original Fluor transferred its assets and liabilities to Fluor–2, there was no fixed sum of money due or to become due. The court of appeal relied on Henkel and held that the consent-to-assignment clauses in Hartford’s policies, which were identical to those in Henkel, barred coverage.[25]

Fluor–2 had argued that the court of appeal should not follow Henkel because, in Henkel, the California SupremeCourt had not considered the effect of Insurance Code Section 520, which provides: “An agreement not to transfer the claim of the insured against the insurer after a loss has happened, is void if made before the loss.... ”[26] Fluor–2 argued that when an assignment of insurance rights takes place after a third party’s exposure to asbestos resulting in personal injury for which the insured may be liable, “a loss has happened” within the meaning of section 520 and an insurer cannot rely on a consent-to-assignment clause in a liability policy to void the assignment.[27]

The court of appeal rejected Fluor–2’s argument, holding: (1) that section 520 applies only in the context of first-party insurance policies and not third-party liability policies, and (2) even if section 520 were applicable to liability insurance, the court would construe a loss as happening only on a finding of liability or imposition of a judgment, not on a finding that a third party had been exposed to asbestos that later resulted in personal injury.[28] Fluor–2 then sought review by the California Supreme Court.

Fluor’s Reversal of Henkel and Adoption of the Majority Rule Limiting the Enforcement of Anti-Assignment Clauses
There was no real dispute that, under Henkel, the original Fluor’s purported transfer of its rights to insurance coverage to Fluor–2 was ineffective. But in Fluor, the California Supreme Court held that section 520—which was not considered in Henkel—changes the result. 

As an initial matter, the Supreme Court disagreed with the court of appeal and found that section 520’s legislative history demonstrates that the statute does indeed apply to third-party liability policies.[29] While the Supreme Court recognized that the Legislature did not likely contemplate liability insurance in 1872 when it first enacted the statute that has now become section 520, the court noted that in 1935, when the Legislature created the Insurance Code, it did not just adopt all former laws relating to insurance—“it actually revised the law relating to insurance.”[30] By 1935, third-party liability insurance was common. Indeed, the Legislature recodified what had been Civil Code former section 2533 (listing the five “most usual kinds of insurance”) as Insurance Code section 100 and, in doing so, the Legislature amended the statute to list 20 classes of insurance, including liability insurance. Furthermore, the wording of what became section 520 was slightly changed, showing that specific attention was paid to that particular provision.[31] And most importantly, the court found that the 1947 amendment of section 520 showed that the statute applied to third-party liability insurance. That year, the Legislature amended section 520 to exclude two specific types of insurance policies—life and disability—yet did not exclude liability insurance. This showed, the court found, that the Legislature viewed section 520 as a “general rule” covering all classes of insurance, even those not specifically identified by the 1872 Legislature.[32] It also showed that only certain, specified types of insurance were excluded from this general rule, and those do not include liability insurance.[33]

After determining that section 520 applies in the third-party liability insurance context, the court then discussed how the statute applies.[34] The controversy centered around the meaning of the phrase “after a loss has happened.” The court held that this phrase was ambiguous. On one hand, it could refer to the time period after the injury or “loss” to a third party has happened—i.e., when an “occurrence” takes place under the policy for which the insured may be liable. On the other hand, it could refer to a much later point in time—the period after the insured has incurred a direct loss by virtue of the entry of a judgment or finalization of a settlement, fixing a sum of money due on a claim. The court found that either interpretation would be reasonable.[35]

Ultimately, the court agreed with Fluor–2 and concluded that the phrase “after a loss has happened” in section 520 should be interpreted to refer to “a loss sustained by a third party that is covered by the insured’s policy, and for which the insured may be liable.”[36] The court found that only this interpretation honors the clear intent demonstrated by the history of section 520 to avoid any “unjust” or “grossly oppressive” enforcement of consent-to-assignment clauses. Furthermore, the court concluded that only this interpretation would protect the ability of an insured, in the course of transferring its assets and liabilities to another company, to assign rights to insurance coverage provided by prior policies concerning the insured’s previous operations or conduct. The court was guided by the fact that this “postloss exception” to the general rule restricting assignability—which is supported by the many cases the court discussed and the history of section 520—is a good rule that contributes to the “efficiency of business by minimizing transaction costs and facilitating economic activity and wealth enhancement.”[37]

Fluor is welcome news for policyholders and brings California law in line with the majority of states that have looked at this issue.[39] Thus, Henkel remains a cautionary tale that should remain top of mind when insurance rights are analyzed as part of a corporate transaction.[40] Purchasers of a business, even where stock is being acquired, should perform careful due diligence regarding prior internal transactions to determine whether an acquiree had earlier assumed liabilities for which historical insurance assets may not be available. Corporations should also consider carefully the insurance implications of internal restructurings that could result in the assumption of liabilities but not the transfer of insurance rights. That is especially true for corporations that face toxic tort or environmental liabilities that arise out of historical operations.


[1] Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 29 Cal. 4th 934 (2003).

[2] Id.

[3] Fluor Corp. v. Superior Court, No. S205889, 2015 WL 4938295 (Cal. Aug. 20, 2015). 

[4] Henkel, 29 Cal. 4th at 938.

[5] Id. at 938–39.

[6] Id.

[7] Id. at 939.

[8] Id. at 939–40.

[9] Id. at 942.

[10] Id. at 943.

[11] Id.

[12] Id.

[13] Fluor Corp., 2015 WL 4938295, at *2. 

[14] Id. at *2–3.

[15] Id. at *2.

[16] Id. at *2–3.

[17] Id. at *3.

[18] Id.

[19] Id.

[20] Id. at *4.

[21] Id.

[22] Id. at *5.

[23] Id.

[24] Id.

[25] Id. at *8–9.

[26] Id. at *1, 8–9.

[27] Id.

[28] Id. at *8–9.

[29] Id. at *9.

[30] Id. at *10 (emphasis added).

[31] Id. at *11.

[32] Id.

[33] Id.

[34] Id. at *12.

[35] Id. at *12–13.

[36] Id. at *26.

[37] Id. at *25.

[38] See, e.g., Gopher Oil Co. v. Am. Hardware Mut. Ins. Co., 588 N.W.2d 756, 763–764 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999); In re ACandS, Inc., 311 B.R. 36, 41 (Bankr. D. Del. 2004); Elliott v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 434 F. Supp. 2d 483, 491 (N.D. Ohio 2006); Egger v. Gulf Ins. Co., 903 A.2d 1219, 1223, 1226–1228 (Pa. 2006); Pilkington N. Am., Inc. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 861 N.E.2d 121, 126, 129 (Ohio 2006); In re Ambassador Ins. Co., 965 A.2d 486, 490–491(Vt. 2008); Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indem. Co., 2 A.3d 76, 107(Del. Ch. 2009); Illinois Tool Works v. Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co., 962 N.E.2d 1042, 1050, 1055 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011); Narruhn v. Alea London, Ltd., 745 S.E.2d 90, 94 (S.C. 2013).

[39] See, e.g., Travelers Cas. and Sur. Co. v. U.S. Filter Corp., 895 N.E.2d 1172 (Ind. 2008).

[40] The issues raised in Flour and Henkel have been addressed by other courts with mixed results. See D.F. McGonigle, “Long-Tail Successor Liability and the Right to Access a Predecessor’s Insurance Coverage: Conflicting Responses from California Courts,” J. of Ins. Coverage, Vol. 4, No. 4, 71, 77 (Autumn 2001). The article refers to Gopher Oil Co. v. Amer. Hardware Mut. Ins. Co., 588 N.W.2d 756 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999), which holds that a successor is entitled to coverage under a predecessor’s policy. However, the article also makes reference to Red Arrow Products Co., Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 607 N.W.2d 294 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000) in which the court denies coverage to the successor because they were neither a party to the original insurance contract, nor an assignee of the policy. See also B.S.B. Diversified Co., Inc. v. Am. Motorists Ins. Co., 947 F. Supp. 1476, 1482 (W.D. Wash. 1996) (holding that a contractual sale of assets is an effective transfer of both liabilities and insurance coverage).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© K&L Gates LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

K&L Gates LLP

K&L Gates LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.