Bridging the Week - January 2018 #2

by Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

  • FINRA Announces 2018 Examination Priorities; Will Review Role of Firms and Salespersons in Facilitating Cryptocurrency Transactions and ICOs: The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority issued its 2018 Regulatory and Examinations Priorities Letter last week setting forth the areas of focus for its inspections of member firms this year. FINRA’s attention will principally be on fraud, high-risk firms and natural person brokers, operational and financial risks, sales practice risks and market integrity.

Among other things, FINRA will be evaluating whether firms’ controls are sufficient to meet their suitability obligations. The regulator “will pay particular attention to suitability determinations where registered representatives recommend complex products to unsophisticated, vulnerable investors.”

Specific sales practice risks FINRA will be reviewing include how firms and their salespersons may facilitate transactions in cryptocurrencies and initial coin offerings. Where an ICO involves the sale of a security, FINRA may look to review the “supervisory and operational infrastructure” a firm has implemented to comply with applicable securities laws and regulations as well as FINRA rules.

FINRA will also be examining firms’ written business continuity plans – particularly after Hurricanes Harvey and Maria – to assess how firms will have continued access to critical systems even when they may not have physical access to relevant offices. Among other things, FINRA will consider how firms implement their BCPs, evaluating under what circumstances a BCP will be activated; how a system may be assessed as critical; how data back-ups and recovery are effectuated; and, as applicable, how firms coordinate with their affiliates and vendors during a situation requiring activation of their BCPs.The self-regulatory organization will also review firms’ technology governance and cybersecurity program effectiveness and anti-money laundering program adequacy. In examining firms’ AML programs, FINRA will assess the adequacy of written policies and procedures to identify and report suspicious transactions; resources committed to AML; and independent testing. FINRA expressed concerned about firms that do not monitor, or monitor less robustly, accounts of affiliates.

FINRA will also focus on firms’ detection of possible manipulation; compliance with best execution requirements, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Market Access Rule and Regulation SHO; and adherence to fixed income data integrity and reporting requirements. Additionally, FINRA will look for possible front running of correlated option products, as well as the adequacy of surveillance of alternative trading systems.

FINRA encouraged members to consider its proposed 2018 priorities in conjunction with its 2017 Examination Findings Report published last December (click here to access). In its Findings Report FINRA made specific recommendations on how firms might improve their cybersecurity and AML programs, enhance their fulfillment of their suitability obligations, and comply with Reg MAR and Reg SHO, based on its observations of effective practices at member firms.

Compliance Weeds: The beginning of the year provides a natural opportunity for registrants to review their written policies and procedures to ensure they still reflect actual practices. It is easy, over time, for policies and procedures to go stale. Unfortunately, if something goes wrong, it will not be helpful to have actual practices that are inconsistent with written policies, or written policies that are so generic they provide no real basis for actual practices.

Additionally, FINRA’s 2018 Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter read in conjunction with its 2017 Examinations Findings Report provides an excellent resource for broker-dealers to assess the adequacy of their policies, procedures and practices against objective standards. FINRA’s publications provide a useful tool against which other SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission registrants may evaluate comparable policies and procedures (e.g., AML, cybersecurity).

  • Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Crypto-Exchange for Allegedly Not Returning Clients’ Funds: Vircurex – a virtual currency exchange – and one of its purported principals were named in a lawsuit filed in a US federal court in Colorado alleging breach of contract, conversion, constructive fraud and unjust enrichment.

According to Timothy Shaw, the named plaintiff in the purported class action lawsuit, Vircurex was founded in October 2011. Although the exchange claims to be incorporated in Belize, this may not be true, claims the plaintiff. The exchange appears to still be operating. (Click here for access to Vircurex’s website.)

The lawsuit alleges that, following its disclosure in March 2014 of two hacking incidents in mid-2013, Vircurex “was nearing insolvency,” and had insufficient Bitcoin and other alt-coins to meet its obligations to customers. The lawsuit claims that, in response, Vircurex froze customer accounts, although it promised to repay its clients over time. To date, claims the plaintiff, this repayment has not been completed.

Also named in the lawsuit were Andreas Eckert, one of the alleged organizers of Vircurex, and “John Doe,” a non-identified purported organizer located in China. Among other things, plaintiff seeks a return of his funds and costs.

Last month, various media sources reported that Youbit, a South Korea-based cryptocurrency exchange, filed for bankruptcy (click here for a sample article).

Among other developments last week involving cryptocurrencies:

  • Secretary of the Treasury Says FSOC Studying Cryptocurrencies: In an interview before the Economic Club of Washington DC on January 12, Steven Mnuchin, Secretary of the US Department of Treasury, said that the Federal Stability Oversight Counsel established a working group to study cryptocurrencies at its last meeting. Mr. Mnuchin said, “We are very focused on … cryptocurrencies.” His two principal priorities regarding cryptocurrencies are to ensure “that bad people cannot use these currencies to do bad things,” and that, “consumers who are trading [cryptocurrencies] understand the risks” in order to avoid being hurt. He said he was not concerned at all that foreign nations such as Russia might develop their own cryptocurrencies to evade sanctions. Created under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, FSOC consists of representatives of nine federal agencies (including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission) and one independent member, and is authorized to identify and monitor excessive risks to the US financial system. (Click here to access Mr. Mnuchin’s interview.)
  • Bitcoin ETF Applications to the SEC Withdrawn: Two firms seeking to list exchange-traded Bitcoin funds – Direxion Shares ETF and ProShares ETF Trust – withdrew their applications with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Both entities – which had filed their applications following the self-certification to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission by three exchanges to list Bitcoin derivatives contracts on December 1, 2017 – indicated their withdrawals were at SEC staff’s request. ProShares sought approval for funds that apparently would have traded Bitcoin futures and not spot Bitcoin. According to Direxion in a letter withdrawing its application (click here to access), “[s]taff expressed concerns regarding the liquidity and valuation of the underlying instruments in which the Fund intends to primarily invest and requested that the Trust withdraw the Amendment until such time as these concerns are resolved.” (Click here for background on the self-certification by three derivatives exchanges in the article “Three CFTC-Regulated Exchanges Self-Certify Bitcoin Derivatives Contracts” in the December 3 edition of Bridging the Week. Click here to access a copy of the ProShares withdrawal letter.)
  • Second State Enjoins BitConnect: North Carolina became the second state to issue a summary cease and desist order against BitConnect, a UK-based cryptocurrency-issuing company, in connection with various digital currency-related investment programs (click here to access the order). The Securities Division of the NC Department of the Secretary of State claimed that BitConnect is selling unregistered securities while not being registered as a dealer or salesman of securities in the state and omitting material facts when offering investments. The Texas State Securities Board previously brought a similar action against BitConnect. (Click here for details in the article “CFTC Issues Explanation of Its Oversight and Approach to Virtual Currency Markets; Texas Securities Board Enjoins Initial Coin Offering” in the January 7, 2018 edition of Bridging the Weeks.)
  • Foreign Countries’ Developments: The Malaysia Securities Commission issued a cease and desist order against the CopyCash Foundation – the backers of a proposed initial coin offering involving CopyCashCoin. The Securities Commission claimed that disclosures in CopyCash’s whitepaper issued in conjunction with its ICO and other presentations to potential investors likely violated applicable securities laws. (Click here to access a copy of the order.) Separately, the Korean Financial Intelligence Unit and the Korean Financial Supervisory Service announced they had begun examining six commercial banks’ compliance with anti-money laundering requirements in connection with their offer of trading accounts on Korean cryptocurrency exchanges. Among other things, the regulators seek to assess whether the banks have electronic systems to ensure that the name of a deposit account holder matches that of a virtual account holder.

My View: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission appear to be taking increasingly divergent approaches to cryptocurrencies. Whereas the CFTC has been aggressive in promulgating consumer education and bringing enforcement actions against violators of relevant laws, it has also granted registration to a swap execution facility and clearing organization that trades and settles Bitcoin derivatives, and has not precluded the self-certification of cash-settled Bitcoin derivatives products. On the other hand, the SEC appears reluctant – even with the advent of Bitcoin derivatives trading on CFTC-overseen markets – to authorize Bitcoin ETFs. The SEC and CFTC should work together to promote clarity in their oversight, not impede the development of digital ledger technologies and related cryptocurrencies, and continue to enforce relevant laws against miscreants – much as the CFTC already is doing. As CFTC Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo has written, “[o]ne thing is certain: ignoring virtual currency trading will not make it go away. Nor is it a responsible regulatory strategy.”

More Briefly:

  • Senate Agricultural Committee Leaders Encourage CFTC to Retaliate Against EC Should EC Withdraw From 2016 Joint Clearinghouse Agreement: Leaders of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry encouraged the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to retaliate against the European Commission should it determine, as a result of Brexit, not to abide by the terms of a 2016 agreement to recognize each other’s overseen clearinghouses as being subject to equivalent regulatory oversight. (Click here for background regarding this agreement in the article “CFTC Approves Substituted Compliance Framework for EU-Based DCOs; EC Formally Recognizes US CCPs as Subject to Equivalent Regulation” in the March 20, 2016 edition of Bridging the Week.) According to Chairman Pat Roberts and ranking Democratic member Debbie Stabenow, “[i]f the EC moves away from the 2016 CFTC-EC agreement, the CFTC should review the appropriateness of the exemptions and relief it has granted to foreign entities, including clearinghouses established in the European Union.” In June 2017, the EC proposed that, after Brexit, it might impose direct requirements on certain non-EU-based clearinghouses that provide services in the European Union. (Click here for background in the article “EC Proposes Two-Tier System for Classifying Third-Country CCPs; Certain Systemically Important CCPs May Be Required to Relocate to the EU” in the June 18, 2017 edition of Bridging the Week.)
  • FERC Rejects Plan to Subsidize Coal and Nuclear Power Plants: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rejected a proposal by Secretary of Energy Rick Perry to subsidize the coal industry by requiring coal and nuclear power plants to maintain at least 90 days of fuel supply on-site in order to ensure the resilience of US electric power grids. Instead, FERC ordered that a new study be conducted to examine any risks to resiliency US electric grid operators may face and possible ways to address any identified risks. FERC expects all regional transmission organizations and independent system operators to respond to FERC queries within 60 days.
  • FCM Fails to Persuade Court to Dismiss Liquidator’s Claims That Payments Made by Sentinel Management Prior to Bankruptcy Were Fraudulent Transfers: MBF Clearing Corporation failed to have dismissed an amended complaint filed against it by Sentinel Liquidation Trust that claimed MBF’s receipt of certain funds from Sentinel Management prior to SM’s collapse in 2007 constituted a prohibited fraudulent conveyance. A US federal court in Illinois previously dismissed the Liquidation Trust’s efforts to claim back funds paid by SM to MBF on the grounds the transfers were an avoidable preference, but did so without precluding the filing of an amended complaint. The US federal court in Illinois evaluating the Liquidation Trust’s current lawsuit rejected MBF’s claims that the amended filing was barred by the statute of limitations (because the amended action related back to the original lawsuit) or by the doctrine of latches (because it was court inaction not the Liquidation’s Trust actions that delayed a re-filing). (Click here for background on this matter in the article “Sentinel Management Former CEO Sentenced to 14 Years in Prison for Fraud; Former Head Trader Receives Eight-Year Term” in the February 1, 2015 edition of Bridging the Week.)
  • Hong Kong-Based Blockchain Company’s Trading Suspended by SEC: The Securities and Exchange Commission temporarily suspended trading in securities of Hong Kong-based UBI Blockchain Internet, Ltd. The SEC took its emergency unilateral action because of concerns related to the accuracy of information in the firm’s filings since at least September 2017 regarding its business operation, and “recent, unusual, and unexplained” market activity in some of the company’s shares since November 2017. The temporary suspension will expire at 11:59 pm EST on January 22.
  • NFA Reminds Members About Doing Business With Exempt CTAs and CPOs: The National Futures Association issued its annual reminder that members dealing with lawfully exempt-from-registration commodity trading advisors and commodity pool operators should take “reasonable steps” through the first quarter of 2018 to ensure such persons are lawfully exempt. This is because lawfully exempt CTAs and CPOs have until March 1 to file with the NFA an annual affirmation regarding their exemption and, if they do not, may be required to be registered. Reasonable steps, said NFA, include reviewing certain information regarding such CPOs and CTAs it provides online. NFA members are not permitted to conduct a customer business with persons required to be registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and members of the NFA who are not.
  • ICE Futures Europe to Transition Certain Energy Contracts to ICE Futures Europe in February: ICE Futures Europe and ICE Futures U.S. announced that, as of trade date February 19, 2018, various North American Oil and Financial Natural Gas Liquids contracts would cease to trade on IFEU and commence trading on IFUS. The transitioned contracts will continue to be cleared at ICE Clear Europe.
  • OFAC Designates New Persons and Entities for Violating Human Rights and Supporting Sanctioned Weapons Creators: The Office of Foreign Assets Control of the US Department of Treasury added 14 persons to its sanction lists. These persons and entities, all from Iran, were added, said OFAC, because of their connection with human rights abuses and censorship, as well as support of sanctioned Iranian weapons developers.

For further information:

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Crypto-Exchange for Allegedly Not Returning Clients’ Funds:

FCM Fails to Persuade Court to Dismiss Liquidator’s Claims That Payments Made by Sentinel Management Prior to Bankruptcy Were Fraudulent Transfers:

FERC Rejects Plan to Subsidize Coal and Nuclear Power Plants:

FINRA Announces 2018 Examination Priorities; Will Review Role of Firms and Salespersons in Facilitating Cryptocurrency Transactions and ICOs:

Hong Kong-Based Blockchain Company’s Trading Suspended by SEC:

ICE Futures Europe to Transition Certain Energy Contracts to ICE Futures Europe in February:

NFA Reminds Members About Doing Business With Exempt CTAs and CPOs:

OFAC Designates New Persons and Entities for Violating Human Rights and Supporting Sanctioned Weapons Creators:

Senate Agricultural Committee Leaders Encourage CFTC to Retaliate Against EC Should EC Withdraw From 2016 Joint Clearinghouse Agreement:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.