Naffe v. Frey, et al.

Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (FRCP 12(b)(6))

by Ronald Coleman

From the Introduction:

This is a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). In moving to dismiss the first Complaint filed in this action, defendant John Patrick Frey (and former defendant Christi Frey) argued that that pleading consisted of no more than a morass of meritless defamation claims recast as specious causes of action,

including a dubious federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). The Freys asked the Court to acknowledge that Plaintiff Nadia Naffe was seeking no more than to use the courts to punish Mr. Frey—a vigorous political opponent—for exercising his First Amendment rights. The Court agreed that Plaintiff had failed to state a federal claim, issuing a Tentative Ruling on December 10, 2012 that focused on Mr. Frey’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) challenge to Plaintiff’s Section 1983 claim and found the claim fatally lacking. The Court’s main basis for dismissal was that, based on the allegations in the Complaint and black-letter law, nothing Mr. Frey is accused

of doing could possibly meet even the most minimal legal standards for stating a claim under that statute.

The Tentative Ruling rejected as insufficient Plaintiff’s conclusory claims that Plaintiff’s hated political rival and critic, Mr. Frey, was acting under color of law based on the mere fact that he works as a Deputy District Attorney. The Court rejected Plaintiff’s suggestion that an assistant district attorney who “uses his blog and his Twitter account as a vehicle for his thoughts and opinions [even] during the time he was supposed to be working as a district attorney and using resources made available to him as a district attorney” was therefore acting “under color of state law.” (Tentative Ruling at 7.) The Court also rejected Plaintiff’s proposition that Mr. Frey

was “known” or identified by others as a district attorney (Id. at 7-8.) or that he referred to “criminal statutes” that Plaintiff may have violated in one of his tweets. (Id. at 10.)

Summing up its analysis, the Court concluded as follows, referring to various material referred to by Plaintiff in opposition to Mr. Frey’s motion that was not part of, or directly incorporated into, the Complaint, and expressing doubt about the validity of Plaintiff’s entitlement to a federal forum absent some saving amendment of her Section 1983 claim:

This material, which does not inform whether or not the Court should dismiss the instant allegations, does inform whether the Court would conclude that any attempt by Plaintiff to amend her allegations should be

deemed futile. The Court would therefore determine whether this is all Plaintiff has further to offer on the question of state action undertaken by Mr. Frey. If so, the Section 1983 claim would be dismissed without leave

to amend, and the Court would have to determine what, if anything, Plaintiff planned to do about her diversity allegations. If the answer is “nothing” and Plaintiff is unable to persuade that she still may maintain an action against Cooley and the County under Section 1983 then the Court would dismiss the remaining claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). If the answer is “nothing” and Plaintiff does persuade that she still would have a viable Section 1983 claim against Cooley and/or the County then the Court would dismiss the remaining claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(2). (Id. at 10-11.)

Plaintiff recognized that this ruling expressed great skepticism that she could state a Section 1983 claim. Her FAC shows a desperate attempt to say something – anything – that would be sufficient to articulate a fact showing that Mr. Frey acted under color of state law, or that her constitutional rights were violated. But as is shown below, Plaintiff does not and cannot articulate specific facts, plausible or otherwise, consistent with the record she has placed before the Court and sufficient to enable her to salvage the FAC. Once again she relies almost entirely on bald, conclusory statements in an attempt to manufacture state action. She also escalates by

making allegations that directly contradict the very documents she cites and incorporates – for instance, by citing posts in which Mr. Frey expressly stated that he was acting in his own capacity, by misrepresenting to the Court what Mr. Frey said in a tweet she incorporates, and by misrepresenting what Mr. Frey’s counsel said in a

blog post she incorporates. In short, she utterly fails to state any facts to repair the deficiencies identified by the Court. For these reasons, the Court should dismiss the FAC without further leave to amend.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info: Legal Memoranda: Motion Addressed to Pleadings | Federal, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Coleman, Archer & Greiner, PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ronald Coleman

Archer & Greiner, PC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.