Calderbank offers – Getting more bang for your buck

by DLA Piper
Contact

The cost-protective benefits of Calderbank offers are often more illusory than real. Courts will only award indemnity costs to the party making the offer where the party demonstrates that it was unreasonable for the other party to not accept the offer. Where the outcome at trial is dependent on the proof of facts by witness testimony or the resolution of differences of expert opinion, a party seeking indemnity costs will generally be challenged to demonstrate that the recipient’s decision not to accept the offer was unreasonable.

The High Court of Australia’s decision last week in Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) (No 2) [2014] HCA 31 highlights that demonstrating unreasonableness is significantly easier where the issues between the parties are focussed on disputes involving the application of existing law than the proof of particular facts. In that case, the dispute between the parties involved the reasonably narrow issue of whether the liquidator of Newtronics Pty Ltd was entitled to an equitable lien over a fund in the liquidation for the costs and charges he had incurred in obtaining that fund through proceedings he had brought against someone else. The Supreme Court of Victoria held that the principle in Re Universal Distributing Co Ltd (In Liq) [1933] HCA 2 applied and that the liquidator was entitled to an equitable lien.

Atco Controls Pty Ltd, which disputed the existence of the lien and asserted a claim to the fund, appealed the Supreme Court’s decision to the Victorian Court of Appeal. Prior to the appeal hearing, the liquidator made a Calderbank offer to Atco. The offer proposed that Atco abandon its claim to the fund and abandon the appeal, in exchange for which the liquidator would not pursue his costs of the original Supreme Court action or his costs of the appeal. Atco did not accept this offer. Atco then went on to be successful in its appeal.

The liquidator appealed the Court of Appeal’s decision to the High Court. The High Court confirmed that the liquidator was entitled to the lien on the basis of the principle in Universal Distributing, allowed the appeal and set aside the Court of Appeal’s decision.

The liquidator sought his costs in both the Court of Appeal and the High Court against Atco on an indemnity basis. His application was founded on Atco’s rejection of his Calderbank offer prior to the Court of Appeal hearing.

When considering the liquidator’s application for indemnity costs, the High Court noted that the application of principle in Universal Distributing to liquidators was not novel. Atco needed to distinguish this principle in order to succeed in its claim, but failed in its attempt. In light of this, the High Court found that Atco’s non-acceptance of the liquidator’s Calderbank offer was not reasonable. It therefore ordered Atco to pay the liquidator’s costs of the appeal to the Court of Appeal on an indemnity basis.

The application for indemnity costs in the High Court was approached differently. This was because the Calderbank offer was not open for acceptance during the course of the High Court appeal. Atco had therefore not failed to do anything during the High Court proceedings that warranted an order for indemnity costs being made in those proceedings.

The High Court’s decision highlights the ease of seeking indemnity costs in a dispute that involves the application of established law to agreed or non-contentious facts as opposed to disputes where the outcome is dependent on testing evidence at trial. It also emphasises the need for parties to remain alert for settlement opportunities throughout the course of multi-stage litigation. Calderbank offers should be considered at all stages of court proceedings, not just at one point. Offers should be made in connection with appeals as well as trials. They should also be made as the litigation develops and a particular party’s position demonstrably strengthens or weakens: the non-acceptance of a Calderbank offer early in proceedings might be reasonable on the limited information available at the time, yet the non-acceptance of an offer made on the same terms later in the proceedings may not be reasonable in the light of additional information disclosed between the parties during the intervening period.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.