California’s privacy statute regulates California companies, but not against out-of-state plaintiffs: a recent decision, 2 takeaways

by DLA Piper

Throughout 2013 and into the new year, the plaintiffs’ bar has continued to file a steady stream of privacy-related class action claims.  With statutes such as California’s Invasion of Privacy Act and the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act providing for fixed statutory damages, the potential exposure for companies that are sued for making telephone calls in violation of the law can be staggering. 

In suits featuring California state law claims and out-of-state plaintiffs, a worthwhile strategy to explore is whether it is possible to limit, or, as we succeeded doing in our client’s case, even eliminate liability by invoking more favorable out-of-state law. 

A recent Central District Court decision – Jonczyk v. First National Capital Corp. – illustrates how an early choice-of-law evaluation in a call recording case can curb a class action suit at the pleading stage.  Though the decision came in the context of California’s Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), in appropriate cases the court’s reasoning may extend outside the scope of CIPA and curtail other California privacy or consumer class actions under California  law.

The legislature intended to protect the interests of California residents – CIPA might not apply in cases with out-of-state plaintiffs

Applying a choice-of-law analysis, the United States District Court for the Central District of California recently dismissed a putative class action plaintiff’s claims for violations of CIPA.  Jonczyk v. First National Capital Corp., et al., No. SACV 13-959-JLS (AGRx), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17211 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2014).  The plaintiff, a Missouri resident, sued First National Capital Corp. – a corporation headquartered in California – for allegedly recording the plaintiff’s calls with a California-based employee that took place while the plaintiff was physically in Missouri.  Notably, while CIPA requires the consent of all parties to a call before a call is recorded, Missouri’s Wiretap Act allows the recording with the consent of one party to a call.

Prompted by the distinction in the statutory schemes, the district court applied California’s governmental interests test to determine which state’s law should apply to the alleged claims at issue.  Having found that a “true conflict” between the statutory schemes exists, the district court determined that Missouri’s interests would be significantly impaired if CIPA, and not Missouri’s Wiretap Act, was applied to determine the outcome of the case.  In reaching its holding, the district court noted that Missouri had intentionally limited the reach of its wiretapping statute so as to curb what it deemed excessive litigation, while the California legislature “specifically stated that its intent was to ‘protect the right of privacy of the people [of California]’” as opposed to privacy rights of foreign states’ residents.  Finding that Missouri’s Wiretap Act applied to plaintiff’s claims, the district court dismissed the plaintiff’s CIPA claims with prejudice.

First National can be reconciled with previous plaintiff-friendly decisions

First National is not an outlier - it is consistent with the rationale of state and federal decisions in which courts have applied CIPA in favor of the plaintiffs’ bar.  In Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., for example, the Supreme Court of California engaged in a choice-of-law analysis and determined that CIPA, rather than Georgia law, applied on the facts at issue.  Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., 39 Cal.4th 95 (2006).  In applying CIPA rather than Georgia’s consumer protection statute, the Kearney Court determined that CIPA can apply in situations featuring California plaintiffs – whose privacy rights the California legislature specifically intended to protect – and out-of-state defendants.

Likewise, First National is consistent with a 2011 federal decision in which the Northern District of California denied a motion to dismiss a CIPA claim brought against a California-headquartered corporation by plaintiffs who were not California residents.  Valentine v. NebuAd, Inc., 804 F.Supp.2d 1022 (N.D. Cal. 2011).  Though Valentine and First National both featured out-of-state plaintiffs and California defendants, unlike First National, the district court in Valentine did not engage in a choice-of-law analysis that took into account the interests of competing states and instead tested whether plaintiffs had standing based on CIPA’s statutory language.  The district court found that nonresident subscribers of Internet service providers had Article III standing and therefore standing “as a matter of statutory construction” to assert claims under CIPA.

Two important takeaways

First National’s potential impact is significant. 

First, while an out-of-state plaintiff may have standing to assert claims under California privacy statutes, a choice-of-law analysis may compel the application of the foreign state’s laws where a true conflict exists.  Thus, defendants may do well by considering arguments apart from standing. 

Second, the Central District of California did not limit its reasoning to Missouri’s Wiretap Act, and, therefore, the holding may apply to other CIPA cases featuring plaintiffs who are residents of states requiring the consent of only one party to lawfully record phone calls, or states that require actual damages or other qualifications before a plaintiff may sue. 

Outside the CIPA context, First National’s rationale may also be persuasive in limiting the reach of California statutes where defendants can point to evidence indicating the legislature’s intent to narrowly protect the interests of California residents.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.