CalPERS Continues To Take Shots At The Press

Allen Matkins
Contact

I continue to be shocked at CalPERS’ vitriolic approach towards the press.  In the last 12 months, CalPERS has taken on The Wall Street Journal, Fox News, several California metropolitan newspapers, several local newspapers, and bloggers.  According to CalPERS, these news organizations are misleading readers, uninformed, off base, wrong, and in need of fact-checking.  The tone of CalPERS’ responses is highly intemperate for any governmental agency.  For example, in one piece, CalPERS hectors “No amount of ranting from reporters will dissuade us from our mission.”  In another, CalPERS menaces “We don’t take it lightly when people call us liars.”  The splenetic quality of these headlines and the accompanying articles causes one to question whether the purpose isn’t to set the record straight but to cow CalPERS’ critics.

OC Register Misleads Readers with Dated Facts  (January 7, 2015)

Fox News VP Presents an Uninformed View on Pensions  (November 25, 2014)

Joe Tarica’s “Disdain” of CalPERS Misplaced (October 27, 2014)

LA Times One-Sided Perspective Falls Short (October 23, 2014)

U-T San Diego Editorial on Pension Ruling Way Off Base (October 7, 2014)

U-T San Diego Editorial Misleads Readers (September 16, 2014)

Tunno Off The Mark in Calaveras Enterprise Column (August 25, 2014)

Beverly Hills Courier Gets Facts Wrong (August 25, 2014)

Borenstein Column Misleads Readers (August 15, 2014)

Fitzgerald Needs a Course in Fact-checking (June 24, 2014)

Mr. Arnold, Your Facts are Wrong (June 6, 2014)

U-T San Diego Editorial Board Needs to Rethink Its Rhetoric (May 8, 2014)

Naked Capitalism Gets it Wrong and Should Choose Words Wisely (March 14, 2014)

Professor Tamar Frankel Weighs In On Grundfest/Gallagher/Macey Debate

Professor Tamar Frankel is a highly regarded expert on fiduciary law and, as I recently learned, an alumna of the California Department of Corporations.  Yesterday, she published this post asking whether Commissioner Gallagher violated the SEC’s Canons of Ethics, 17 C.F.R. §§ 200.50 – .72.

History buffs can read SEC Chairman Edward N. Gadsby’s 1958 announcement of the SEC’s adoption of its first Canons of Ethics here.

Professor Frankel’s piece refers to the “Canon of Ethics” but both the original announcement and the current codification use the plural form.  The words “canon” and “cannon” are homophones but they derive from two different Greek words.  “Canon” is derived from κανών, which means a straight rod or bar and hence rule or standard.  “Cannon” is derived from κάννα, which means a reed, or more specifically Arundo.

Arundo.donax1web

Arundo Donax, a reed native to the Mediterranean Basin and invasive in southern California

 

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide