Can a license issued by Health Canada for producing or dealing cannabis be assigned as security?

by Dentons


[co-author: Caitlin Choi - articling student]


The last year has been filled with sensational headlines relating to the spectacular growth and rise to prominence of Licensed Producers (as defined below) in response to the federal government's plan to legalize recreational cannabis use by July 2018. In order to meet the expected demand by the recreational market, which some have estimated could be worth more than CA$22.6 billion, Licensed Producers have been raising capital to build growing capacity.

The primary source of financing for Licensed Producers has been equity investors, such as investment banks, venture capital firms and private equity funds, among others. There has, however, been a noticeable absence of debt financing being provided to Licensed Producers, particularly from larger institutions and banks. One reason for this is the legal uncertainty surrounding whether Health Canada licences for producing and dealing cannabis (Cannabis Licences) can be assigned as security for a loan. As one marijuana sector analyst stated earlier this year, "One of the most significant components of a [cannabis] company's valuation is its licence."1 Given the significant value that can be placed on Cannabis Licences, the ability to collateralize such licence affects a Licensed Producer's ability to secure credit.

This article briefly discusses the legal issues that arise surrounding the law in Ontario with respect to the assignability of licences and its application to Cannabis Licences. Despite the perceived ambiguity in this area, Cannabis Licences are, in principle, personal property and, therefore, assignable under the Personal Property Security Act (Ontario) ( PPSA).


Health Canada issues two types of licences for the cannabis industry. Under the Access to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations (ACMPR), licences are issued to producers of cannabis (Licensed Producers) who can, among other things, possess, produce, sell, deliver and destroy cannabis, subject to applicable regulations. Under the Narcotics Control Regulations (NCR), licences are issued to dealers of cannabis (Licensed Dealers) who can, among other things, produce, make, assemble, sell, provide and transport cannabis, subject to applicable regulations.

Statutory interpretation

There is no language in the ACMPR or the NCR that expressly restricts or prohibits the assignment of Cannabis Licences. The question then is whether Cannabis Licences are "personal property" pursuant to the PPSA, the governing statute for secured lending transactions in Ontario. If they are, Cannabis Licences may be treated as collateral for securing loans.

In Ontario, as in most other provinces, the definition of "personal property" does not expressly include licences of any kind. Under the PPSA, the definition of personal property consists of tangible items and "intangibles". The definition of "intangible", unhelpfully, inherently requires an understanding of the limits of personal property. The PPSA defines "intangible" as "all personal property, including choses in action, that is not goods, chattel paper, documents of title, instruments, money or investment property".

Recently, there has been a movement to include licences in the definition of personal property in the PPSA. In 2015, the Ministry of Government and Consumer Services (the Ministry) convened a panel to create a report advising the Ministry on how to modernize business laws in Ontario. The panel released its report in June 2015 with the recommendation that, among others, licences and quotas be included in the definition of "intangible" in the PPSA.2 This has been an issue at an administrative level for some time. In 1998, the Canadian Bar Association Ontario Branch recommended that amendments be made to the PPSA to include licences in the definition of "intangible". It stressed that this would not fetter the government's discretion to regulate because the discretion followed the licences into the hands of any assignee3 – an argument which the Supreme Court of Canada revived in Saulnier (Receiver of) v. Saulnier.4

Common Law analysis

In Saulnier, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) held that a fishing licence is property for the purposes of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Personal Property Security Act (Nova Scotia) ( NSPPSA).

The appellants, a bankrupt fisherman and his wholly-owned company, tried to argue that their fishing licences were not "personal property" pursuant to the NSPPSA. The appellant did not want its licences to transfer to the respondent bank which held a general security agreement, in its favour, executed by the appellant. The licences in question were issued pursuant to the federal Fishery (General) Regulations (Fishing Regulations). They were estimated to be worth up to half a million dollars or more.

The appellant took the position that the licences were merely a "privilege" to do that which would otherwise be illegal – not a property right. The SCC rejected that argument and instead found that the licences were, in fact, privileges, coupled with a proprietary interest in any fish caught, pursuant to the fishing effort. The SCC determined that this type of licence bore some analogy to a common law profit a prendre, which is "undeniably a property right", in the words of the SCC.5 As such, the licences were sufficiently property-like to be considered intangible property within the meaning of the NSPPSA.

It is important to note that, the SCC's analysis was grounded in interpreting the meaning of "property" within the context of the legislation. The SCC concluded that the property aspect of the licences was sufficient to satisfy the definition of "intangible", given the broad language of the NSPPSA and the fact that it is intended to facilitate financings and the protection of creditors should a borrower default. The SCC noted that commercial licences can have significant implications for borrowers in obtaining loans, and lenders in recovering what they are owed.


Cannabis Licences are not a profit a prendre. They do not involve a right of entry to access a public resource, coupled with a property right in the products subsequently gathered. However, the SCC itself recognized that this would not be the case with statutory licences. While using the analogy to prove a property-like quality in the licence in Saulnier, it acknowledged that even the fishing licences were not truly "property" under the common law. Rather, it was a question of degree, given the commercial nature and language of the statute, as to how property-like the bundle of rights of a licence was.  

Cannabis Licences do involve the right to obtain a beneficial interest to the earnings gathered under the licence. They are essential to the value of the property created under the licence, namely the cannabis and cannabis products. Without the Cannabis Licences, neither a Licensed Producer nor Licensed Dealer are able to legally possess those goods, let alone sell them for a profit. As such, there is a property right element to Cannabis Licences that would not be true of licences that merely provide the right to do something which is otherwise illegal.

Given the highly-regulated nature of the cannabis industry, if Cannabis Licences are not assignable as security, a cannabis company's inventory would be of limited value to a creditor. The equipment of a cannabis company can also be highly specialized, and without the right to possess and handle the products, the equipment would have no value as well.

The federal government has expended significant effort in creating a statutory framework for the legalization of cannabis. If it was the government's intent to curtail the assignment of a Cannabis Licence (either because of sensitivities surrounding the Cannabis Licence itself or an attempt to limit the forms of financings available to Licensed Producers or Licensed Dealers), it could have easily done so with anti-assignment provisions within the ACMPR.

1 Sunny Freeman, "Why smaller banks take bigger slice of the growing medical marijuana business", Financial Post, January 30, 2017.

2 Ministry of Government and Consumer Services, "The Priority Findings and Recommendations Report" (Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2015), p. 10.

3 Canadian Bar Association – Ontario, Submission to the Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations Concerning the Personal Property Security Act (October 21, 1988), p. 7.

4Saulnier v Saulnier, 2008 SCC 58 at para 50 [Saulnier].

5 A profit a prendre is an ancient common law right that enables one to enter onto the land of another to extract some part of the natural produce. Similarly, the fishing licence allows access to a public resource as well as a right to the profits from whatever fish the holder is able to "harvest".


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Dentons on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.