CFPB Consent Order Against Lender over MLA Violations Granted

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC

The CFPB recently entered into a Stipulated Final Judgment and Order against a California-based online lender over allegations that the company violated the Military Lending Act (MLA). The order has been approved by a federal district court in the Northern District of California.  

According to the CFPB’s complaint, filed on December 4, 2020, the company violated the MLA’s extension of credit rate cap by imposing a Military Annual Percentage Rate (MAPR) greater than 36%. The MLA prohibits lenders from imposing MAPR rates greater than 36% on extensions of closed-end credit made to covered borrowers.

Further, the company allegedly issued installment loans to over 1,200 borrowers covered under the MLA through loan agreements requiring borrowers to submit to arbitration. Requiring borrowers to submit to arbitration in the event of a dispute is unlawful under the MLA.

Lastly, the CFPB alleged that the company failed to comply with the MLA’s requirement that creditors make loan disclosures to borrowers before or at the time the borrower becomes obligated to the creditor. Per the complaint, the company extended over 4,100 single-payment or installment loans to covered borrowers without making all disclosures required by the MLA.

According to the Final Order, the company must review all information furnished to consumer reporting agencies dating back to October 2016 regarding consumers affected by these violations, and determine whether any information requires correction. Further, the company has 45 days from the entry of the Final Order on January 20, 2021, to submit its compliance plan to the CFPB’s Regional Director for approval. Although the company must submit certain documents to the Regional Director for review, it is the company’s Board of Directors who are responsible for ensuring compliance with the MLA. Should any developments affect the company’s ability to comply with the MLA, the CFPB must be notified either 30 days prior to the development or as soon as practicable if the development was unforeseeable. Lastly, the company must pay $300,000 in redress to affected consumers, and an additional $950,000 in civil penalties to the CFPB.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Weiner Brodsky Kider PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC

Weiner Brodsky Kider PC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.