Challenge to Pension Fund Investment Decision Time Barred

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog
Contact

A federal district court in California held that a complaint filed by members of the International Union of Operating Engineers that challenged pension plan trustees’ decision to make certain investments was filed five days too late and thus barred by ERISA’s six-year statute of limitations.  In so holding, the court ruled that the limitations period commenced at the time the fund entered into the investment management agreement, not the time when the plan assets were actually invested.  The court explained that the action of making the payments into the investment were ministerial acts, as the fund had already been legally obligated to make them.  The case is Slack v. Burns, 13-CV-5001, 2016 BL 233292 (N.D. Cal. July 20, 2016).

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog

Written by:

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Proskauer - Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Blog on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide