City of Toledo voters pass the Lake Erie Bill of Rights, potentially affecting Lake Erie watershed dischargers

Bricker & Eckler LLP
Contact

Bricker & Eckler LLP

In a February 26, 2019, special election, Toledo’s voters passed the Lake Erie Bill of Rights (LEBOR). The LEBOR is an amendment to the City of Toledo’s Charter that creates a new cause of action for the violation of the right of Lake Erie and its watershed to “exist, flourish, and naturally evolve.” 

The entities that could be impacted by the LEBOR’s enactment range far and wide. Generally, entities that have an Ohio EPA-issued water discharge permit authorizing them to discharge into surface waters within the Lake Erie watershed could be affected. 

No additional regulatory oversight will be created by the LEBOR. The LEBOR’s language does not create regulations that must be followed, nor does it attempt to give any regulatory authority to any office or organization. It purports to be “self-executing.” On its own, it would only allow the City of Toledo or citizens of Toledo to bring a legal action for an alleged violation of Lake Erie’s legal rights. 

The LEBOR would, however, affect permits, licenses and other authorizations made by the state and even the federal government. Section 2(b) states that “[n]o permit, license, privilege, charter, or other authorization issued to a corporation, by any state or federal entity, that would violate the prohibitions of this law or any rights secured by this law, shall be deemed valid within the City of Toledo.” All permits issued by the federal EPA, the Ohio EPA, or the federal or state departments of agriculture would be deemed invalid to the extent they conflict with a citizen’s conception of the LEBOR’s provisions. If one presently holds existing permits that he or she anticipates may run afoul of the LEBOR, it would be best to carefully monitor this situation. 

Also, on February 27, 2019, Drewes Farm Partnership v. City of Toledo was filed in federal court in Toledo, asserting many challenges to the LEBOR, including the argument that the LEBOR exceeds Toledo’s limited authority to pass legislation and is in violation of state and federal preemption laws. Drewes seeks a preliminary injunction to stop the LEBOR from going into effect before its defects are litigated. Numerous legal challenges to the LEBOR are anticipated in the near future on the basis of its overreach and broad declarations.

[View source.]

Written by:

Bricker & Eckler LLP
Contact
more
less

Bricker & Eckler LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.