Class Action Decisions Published October 2024

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Highlights from this issue include: 

  • Rule 23(c)(4) Issues Classes. In a question of first impression, the Seventh Circuit joined the Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth and Ninth Circuits—and disagreed with the Fifth Circuit—and held that a party seeking certification of an issue class under Rule 23(c)(4) must show that common questions predominate in the resolution of the specific issue or issues that are the subject of the certification motion and not to the cause of action, taken as a whole.
  • Timing of Rule 23(f) Appeals. The Eleventh Circuit held it had authority to decide a Rule 23(f) appeal, even when there was also a concurrent and pending motion to decertify at the district court because the appealing party’s only opportunity to challenge the class certification order was in a Rule 23(f) appeal as it could not appeal the decision on a motion to decertify.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Written by:

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide