Client Alert: Florida Supreme Court Weighs in on CGL Carriers’ Duty to Defend Chapter 558 Claims

by Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

Since its enactment in 2003, Chapter 558, Florida Statutes (commonly referred to as Florida’s notice and opportunity to cure provision) has governed the pre-suit notice and opportunity to repair process between owners, designers, contractors, and subcontractors involved in construction defect claims.  Although the statute speaks primarily to the obligations of these parties, Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) insurers also play an integral role in the resolution of such claims.  While CGL insurers ordinarily monitor, and will sometimes agree to settle 558 claims pre-suit, until recently, Florida law was silent as to whether insurers had an obligation to defend their insureds during the 558 process.  In the absence of a legal duty to defend, CGL insurers routinely denied their insured’s requests for defense counsel during the 558 process.  However, more recently, the Florida legislature amended Chapter 558 in an effort to, among other things, include CGL insurers in the pre-suit 558 process.

On December 14, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court issued its ruling in Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, which considered whether CGL insurers owe a duty to defend pre-suit claims pursuant to Chapter 558.1 Florida law now holds that under the terms of a standard CGL policy, an insurer who consents to its insured’s participation in the 558 process owes a duty to defend to the insured.

The general contractor in Altman built a high rise condominium project in South Florida.  Following completion of the project, the condominium association served multiple Chapter 558 notices during a 7 month period, in which it identified approximately 800 construction defects.  At least 16 defects resulted in damage to other property.  The contractor tendered defense and indemnity to its insurer during the 558 process.  The carrier denied coverage on the grounds that a Chapter 558 notice did not constitute a “suit” which triggered coverage under the policy.  While the insurer eventually accepted the contractor’s tender of defense during the pendency of the 558 claim, it did so under a reservation of rights.  Ultimately, the contractor settled the association’s 558 claim without a contribution from its CGL carrier.  The contractor then filed suit against its insurer to recover the legal fees and indemnity costs it incurred as a result of the 558 claim.

A federal trial judge considered whether a 558 notice triggered a CGL insurer’s defense obligations pursuant to the terms of the policy.2 The court began by recognizing the unique nature of Fla. Stat. §558.004(13), which states that the provision of a 558 notice to an insurer does not constitute a claim for insurance purposes.  Consequently, the court held that while an insured’s furnishing of a notice to its insurer does not constitute a claim, the contents of the notice may constitute a claim which triggers an insurer’s defense and indemnity obligations.

The court went on to examine the terms of the contractor’s CGL policy, and more specifically, whether a 558 claim constitutes a “suit” which triggers the insurer’s defense and indemnity obligations.  The policies at issue provided that the insurer had “the right and duty to defend the insured against any ‘suit’ seeking […] damages.” The policies defined “suit” as:

“ […] a civil proceeding in which damages because of ‘bodily injury,’ ‘property damage’ or ‘personal and advertising injury’ to which this insurance applies are alleged. ‘ Suit’ includes:

  1. An arbitration proceeding in which such damages are claimed and to which the insured must submit or does submit with our consent; or
  2. Any other alternative dispute resolution proceeding in which such damages are claimed and to which the insured submits with our consent.”

The contractor argued that the 558 notices at issue were tantamount to a “suit,” because the Chapter 558 requires such notice before suit can be filed.The trial court rejected this argument, and construed Chapter 558’s notice and opportunity to repair provisions as a dispute resolution mechanism, rather than proceeding.In doing so, it held the insurer had no duty to defend its insured’s 558 claim.

The contractor appealed to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which, like the trial judge, agreed that the express language of Chapter 558 does exclude a 558 claim as triggering occurrence under a CGL policy.3  Unlike the trial court, however, the appeals court expressed uncertainty as to whether the CGL policy terms “suit” and “civil proceeding” were in fact unambiguous.  It expressed further concern regarding the competing practical and public policy implications its ruling would have on CGL policyholders and insurers.  A finding that insurers have no duty defend during the 558 process would make it more likely that a 558 notice recipient would allow claims to go into suit to trigger coverage.  Such a practice would undercut the legislative purpose of promoting early and efficient dispute resolution.  In contrast, imposition of a duty to defend during the 558 process could result in an increase in insurance premiums for insureds, or “overlawyered” claims.  Ultimately, the 11th Circuit was unwilling to resolve the issue of whether coverage existed under the CGL policy, and requested the Florida Supreme Court weigh in on the issue.

In its opinion, the Florida Supreme Court agreed that Fla. Stat. §558.004(13) does not exclude pre-suit claims from the category of occurrences which trigger coverage.  It further agreed that Chapter 558 claims do not constitute a “civil proceeding” which would give rise to coverage under subsection (a), above.  However, it found that 558 notices meet the definition of a “suit” as set forth in subsection (b), which includes an “alternative dispute resolution proceeding in which such damages are claimed and to which the insured submits with our consent.”  It reasoned that a 558 notice qualifies as an “alternative dispute resolution proceeding,” based upon statutory language which describes the 558 process as both an “alternative dispute resolution mechanism” and an “alternative method to resolve construction disputes.”  Such claims are, by statutory definition, “claims for damages.”  Thus, the court held that Chapter 558 claims meet the definition of a “suit” which can trigger coverage under the terms of a CGL policy.  The Court declined to rule on the disputed issue of whether the contractor obtained its insurer’s “consent” to participate in the 558 process as further required by subsection (b).

The holding in Altman will undoubtedly impact the manner in which CGL policyholders and their insurers handle 558 claims.  Contractors, subcontractors, and other industry professionals who receive a 558 notice may now tender defense to their carriers during the 558 process with the expectation that their carriers will have a defense obligation.  As alluded to in the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion, for a 558 notice to constitute a claim, the CGL policyholder must also seek consent of its insurer to participate in the 558 process.

This “consent” requirement may result in a tension between an insured’s obligations under Chapter 558, and the insurer’s right to approve its insured’s participation in the 558 process.  Although there is some concern that policyholders may be left “at the mercy of the insurer,” there are some practical and legal reasons why an insurer might consent.  First, it is usually to the insurer’s benefit to participate in the 558 process, as it allows for an early evaluation of the insured’s potential liability and damages exposure.  Second, the 558 process provides an early opportunity for insureds to mitigate damages.  Because carriers owe common law and statutory duties of good faith to their insureds, an insurer’s refusal to consent to the 558 process may deprive its insured of this ability, thereby exposing the insurer to potential bad faith liability.

In sum, the Altman decision is a significant ruling for construction industry professionals who wish to recover the legal fees and costs associated with 558 claims.  For policyholders who elect to tender 558 claims to their insurers, care should be taken to obtain the insurer’s consent upon receipt of a 558 notice to ensure coverage is triggered.

1 Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co., 2017 WL 6379535 (Fla. 2017)

2 Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co., 124 F. Supp. 3d 1272 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

3 Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co., 832 F.3d 1318, 1319 (11th Cir. 2016).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.