Company May Be Liable for Temporary Worker’s Discrimination Claims

Foley Hoag LLP

A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Faush v. Tuesday Morning, Inc., is a reminder that companies that utilize employees of staffing companies are not insulated from employment law claims. In Faush, the Court held that a company may be liable for discrimination under Title VII, even though the employee in question was employed by a third-party staffing agency. This decision is only the latest effort by courts and governmental agencies to examine the use of staffing companies and to determine that companies using temporary labor are joint employers. For example, as we reported in late August (see below), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently held companies may have a duty to bargain with unions representing temporary employees who are supplied by staffing agencies.

In Faush, the plaintiff filed a discrimination lawsuit against Tuesday Morning, Inc., a retailer, even though the retailer had not been his direct employer. Specifically, the retailer had entered into an agreement with a staffing agency to provide it with several temporary employees, including the plaintiff, to help with the opening of a new store. The retailer did not pay the temporary employees directly and did not have the authority to hire and fire the temporary employees. However, the retailer supervised the temporary employees in the day-to-day performance of their job duties, provided temporary employees with site-specific training and necessary equipment and materials, and kept track of temporary employees’ hours. Weighing these factors, the Third Circuit found that the retailer exercised sufficient control over the temporary employees to be considered as a joint employer under Title VII.

While many companies utilize workers supplied by staffing companies in order to avoid a direct employment relationship and related legal obligations, the decision makes clear that the user companies may nonetheless be joint employers. This means that companies need to think carefully about how much control they exercise over individuals employed by a staffing company and ensure that basic employment standards are being met.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP

Foley Hoag LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.