Condemned to Lose Your ADIT?

Holland & Knight LLP
Contact

Holland & Knight LLP

Highlights

  • In a private letter ruling, the IRS concluded that a condemnation of public utility property is effectively a "retirement" or "disposition" that requires the elimination of Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (ADIT) associated with the condemned property.
  • The IRS also concluded that the so-called "consistency rules" of Section 168(i)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) mandate that the removal of condemned public utility property from rate base also requires that the associated ADIT be eliminated.
  • The IRS had not previously ruled on the normalization consequences of a condemnation of public utility property under Section 1033 of the Code.

In a private letter ruling,1 the IRS concluded that the condemnation of public utility property is in effect a "retirement" or "disposition" that requires the elimination of accumulated deferred income taxes (ADIT) associated with the condemned property.

Addressing Condemned Property

The water and waste water treatment utility subject to rate regulation on a cost of service/rate of return basis had certain of its public utility property condemned by a local government. The taxpayer elected to defer the gain attributable to the condemnation of its facilities under Section 1033(a)(2) of the Code, reducing the basis of the replacement assets it acquired by the amount of the deferred gain under Section 1033(b). Following the condemnation, the companies became non-operating utilities, owned no operational assets or public utility property subject to cost of service/rate of return regulation, and served no customers.

In accordance with the Uniform System of Accounts, the taxpayer had recorded ADIT to reflect the method/life timing differences resulting from the use of accelerated depreciation (MACRS) for federal income tax purposes and the book depreciation method used for ratemaking purposes.2 The proper treatment of the ADIT under the normalization rules of Section 168(i)(9) upon the condemnation of the taxpayer's public utility property was the subject of a rate proceeding with the taxpayer's public commission (Commission). The Commission ordered the taxpayer to seek a private letter ruling to confirm or refute the author's testimony in that proceeding that the failure to eliminate the ADIT upon the condemnation would violate the normalization rules.

The IRS noted that under Treas. Reg. § 1.168-8, tax depreciation ceases when an asset is transferred or permanently withdrawn from service. For purposes of this rule, a disposition includes a sale, exchange, retirement, physical abandonment or destruction of an asset. The ruling concluded that the condemnation was such a disposition because it was the "functional equivalent" of a retirement. Accordingly, under Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168-(a)(8)(a), 168-8(b)(2) and 1.167(l)-1(h)(2), the ADIT associated with those retired former public utility assets must be eliminated.

In addition, under the so-called "consistency rules" of Section 168(i)(9), there must be consistent treatment of depreciation expense, tax expense, rate base and the reserve for deferred taxes for ratemaking purposes. Thus, when depreciation ceases upon the condemnation and the property is removed from rate base, the associated ADIT must be removed from the reserve for deferred taxes.

Holland & Knight Insight: The IRS distinguished the rules of Section 168(i)(7), which allow for the transfer of ADIT upon a disposition in "carryover basis" transactions such as those under Section 351 or Section 721 of the Code. However, these rules were inapplicable to condemnations because Section 1033 provides for a "substituted basis." It further noted that similar rules apply to unamortized investment tax credits related to deregulated property.

Although the IRS had not previously ruled on the normalization consequences of a condemnation of public utility property, in the private letter ruling it correctly concluded that the failure to eliminate the ADIT associated with condemned property subject to a Section 1033 election would violate the normalization rules.

Notes

1 The IRS has not yet publicly released the private letter ruling.

2 See Treas. Reg. § 1.167(l)-1(h)(2).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Holland & Knight LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Holland & Knight LLP
Contact
more
less

Holland & Knight LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide