Copyright Alert: Associated Press v. Meltwater

by Fenwick & West LLP

Meltwater News infringed copyrights of the Associated Press (AP), the U.S. District Court for the Southern District in Manhattan held last week, when Meltwater republished excerpts of AP news stories as part of its online news aggregation service.  The excerpts were made available in response to searches for news by Meltwater customers.   Rejecting the contention that Meltwater offered a navigation tool for internet users "to improve access to content across the Internet," the court held Meltwater was simply a "clipping service" that made "undiluted use" of AP's protected articles, providing them to users of an expensive and "closed subscriber system." 2013 WL 1153979 (S.D.N.Y.)

Meltwater characterizes itself as an online media intelligence service which searches news sources using keywords which are of relevance to its business customers.  It then delivers the search results in the form of short excerpts from, with links to, the original articles.  According to the court, Meltwater markets itself as a "customized news digest" that can save readers the time it takes to read an entire article. The AP is a news agency, owned by over 1,400 newspapers and radio and television stations in the United States.  Its news content comes from stories contributed by its owners and the work of its staff journalists. The AP sued Meltwater in 2012 for copyright infringement, claiming that the Meltwater search results infringed the AP's copyrights in the news articles included in the results. The suit centered on 33 specific AP articles that were excerpted by the Meltwater service.

Meltwater relied on five affirmative defenses to the AP's claims of copyright infringement including: (i) fair use, (ii) implied license, and (iii) copyright misuse. 

Spurning Meltwater's defenses, Judge Denise Cote granted summary judgment for the AP, commenting that news services like the AP provide a public service and that Meltwater's business model put that service in danger. She noted that "Investigating and writing about newsworthy events occurring around the globe is an expensive undertaking, and enforcement of the copyright laws permits AP to earn the revenue that underwrites that work." "Permitting Meltwater to take the fruit of AP's labor for its own profit, without compensating AP, injures AP's ability to perform this essential function of democracy."

Fair use

Section 106 of the U.S. Copyright Act affords a copyright holder certain exclusive rights in a copyright protected work – including to reproduce, prepare derivative works based upon and to distribute copies of the work.   However, as the Meltwater court noted, copyright law recognizes the need for "breathing space."  In certain circumstances, it is permitted to use protected works without permission of the copyright owner – if the use is a "fair use."   In order to determine whether or not a use is fair, a four part test is applied to the use, looking at (i) the purpose and character of the use – and whether the use is somehow "transformative" in nature relative to the original purpose for the work, (ii) the nature of the work in question, (iii) the amount of the work used in relation to the work as a whole and (iv) the effect of the use on the potential market for or value of the work.  Applying this test, the court held that Meltwater's use of the AP articles was not a fair use. 

The use of copyright-protected materials by search engines like Google, for example, in their presentation of search results, has been established in most cases as fair use in light of the important role that search engines play in the modern world and their corresponding "transformative" use of protected works in production of search results.   

Meltwater argued that its service was analogous to a search engine because it only provided its customers with headlines and portions of articles in response to search terms and did not reproduce the articles in their entirety.  Judge Cote was not convinced.  She noted that Meltwater added no commentary or insight about the articles it excerpted and, importantly, that Meltwater users generally did not use the links to the full articles.  The service could not truly be considered as a search engine because it went beyond offering information location functionality.  "Instead of driving subscribers to third-party websites, Meltwater News acts as a substitute for news sites operated or licensed by AP." The court did, however, make efforts to distinguish "legitimate" search engines, which only use copyrighted material as part of an information-location tool, emphasizing that a publicly available tool to improve access to content on the internet is very different from a private, fee-requiring subscription service.

The AP also argued that the "lede", which is the first portion of an article, is designed to convey the "heart of the story, rather than serving as a teaser for the reminder of the story."  It is well established that copying the "heart" of a copyright protected work, regardless of the length of the excerpt, weighs against fair use.  The court agreed with the AP that copying an excerpt of an article containing the lede must weigh against fair use because it included the part of the article users wanted to read most and could lead to a substitute for reading the article in its entirety.  This is a somewhat surprising result in the context of news reporting, because, as some amici pointed out, the "heart of the work" doctrine does not work well for news articles.  If an excerpt of a news article is shared, the focus is almost always on the most important aspect of the article, which tends to be factual in nature, and consequently only enjoys thin copyright protection. 

The case illustrates an important consideration for online service providers, which is that the way end-users wind up actually using a service – regardless of the actual or nominal intent of the service provider when it launches a service – can play an important role in a court's later assessment of the nature of the service.  Here, the copying of the "lede," as the court saw it, reinforced the practice of end-users to use Meltwater as their destination site; that is to say, as a news service, and not as a location tool. 

Despite the attempt to insulate search engine functionality generally, the findings on fair use raise questions about when use of copyright protected content by search engines is actually a fair use.  While standalone search engine services may not be overly concerned by this ruling, it may become difficult to recognize what a "legitimate" search engine is as contemplated by the court.  The court's holding will be troubling for online news aggregators, particularly those which do not add commentary or opinion about the news articles they aggregate, but rather publish excerpts of the articles.    

Implied License

Meltwater employed a web crawler, automated software that collected the news stories available for searches on Meltwater.  Meltwater argued that it had an implied license to access the articles because the AP didn't use a robots.txt. protocol to block copying by Meltwater's web crawler.  Robots.txt files give websites a tool to permit or disallow certain website crawlers.  Some courts have looked to these files to determine if there is permission to include a particular website in search results, and Meltwater sought to rely on this concept.  The New York court did not directly disagree with the leading robots.txt cases; however, it concluded that they were inapplicable.  The court observed that the burden remained on the infringing party to show proper use of protected materials rather than on the rights holder to prevent unauthorized use.

Copyright Misuse

Meltwater also argued that the AP engaged in price fixing with competing news organizations in violation of antitrust laws and consequently misused its copyrights – i.e. endeavoring to "control competition in an area outside the copyright."  Noting that the Second Circuit had not yet recognized a defense of copyright misuse, the court rejected the notion that the AP forced pricing arrangements onto companies licensing news articles and reports.  On the contrary, the court emphasized that the AP does not create or control access to the news and has no power or restrictive authority over anyone wishing to report the news.

The AP praised the decision, calling it "an important ruling" for news organizations that "work so hard to provide high-quality original news reports on which the public relies."  Meltwater decried the ruling as a loss for Internet freedom and the fair use doctrine, noting the implications for "other search engines and services."   It plans to appeal to the Second Circuit. However until there is an appellate ruling, Judge Cote's decision will be a focal point in the suits against content aggregation services which will inevitably come in the wake of this decision.

Written by:

Fenwick & West LLP

Fenwick & West LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.